<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Smaller Wall Street Journal on the Way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allfinancialmatters.com/2005/10/21/a-smaller-wall-street-journal-on-the-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2005/10/21/a-smaller-wall-street-journal-on-the-way/</link>
	<description>A personal finance blog dedicated to discussing such topics as budgeting, asset allocation, 401K, IRA, cash flow, insurance, financial planning, portfolio management, and other areas in personal finance.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:56:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: StopBuyingCrap.com &#187; No more WSJ, enter Financial Times?</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2005/10/21/a-smaller-wall-street-journal-on-the-way/comment-page-1/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>StopBuyingCrap.com &#187; No more WSJ, enter Financial Times?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 08:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allthingsfinancialblog.com/2005/10/21/a-smaller-wall-street-journal-on-the-way/#comment-397</guid>
		<description>[...] Sigh. I didn&#8217;t even get to try the smaller version that JLP from All Things Financial mentioned. (Actually I prefer it large, otherwise I might as well read a magazine!) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sigh. I didn&#8217;t even get to try the smaller version that JLP from All Things Financial mentioned. (Actually I prefer it large, otherwise I might as well read a magazine!) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khyron</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2005/10/21/a-smaller-wall-street-journal-on-the-way/comment-page-1/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Khyron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allthingsfinancialblog.com/2005/10/21/a-smaller-wall-street-journal-on-the-way/#comment-366</guid>
		<description>I go all electronic. The additional cost of the online version once you have the dead tree sub is ridiculous. Also, you can get the online version anywhere, anytime, plus 90 days of free archive access (increased from 30) and Barron&#039;s online to boot. (Reading this week&#039;s issue of Barron&#039;s in another tab right now.) I say the online version goes further and is tree friendlier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I go all electronic. The additional cost of the online version once you have the dead tree sub is ridiculous. Also, you can get the online version anywhere, anytime, plus 90 days of free archive access (increased from 30) and Barron&#8217;s online to boot. (Reading this week&#8217;s issue of Barron&#8217;s in another tab right now.) I say the online version goes further and is tree friendlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2005/10/21/a-smaller-wall-street-journal-on-the-way/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allthingsfinancialblog.com/2005/10/21/a-smaller-wall-street-journal-on-the-way/#comment-365</guid>
		<description>We get the WSJ in our office, and of course it includes access to the website.  I prefer to read it on the Internet rather than the paper version, but sometimes read the paper version while having lunch.  A smaller paper version would fit onto the table better with my lunch, so it sounds good to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We get the WSJ in our office, and of course it includes access to the website.  I prefer to read it on the Internet rather than the paper version, but sometimes read the paper version while having lunch.  A smaller paper version would fit onto the table better with my lunch, so it sounds good to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thc</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2005/10/21/a-smaller-wall-street-journal-on-the-way/comment-page-1/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>thc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 02:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allthingsfinancialblog.com/2005/10/21/a-smaller-wall-street-journal-on-the-way/#comment-364</guid>
		<description>A few years ago they shrank the SF Chronicle and I love it!  It&#039;s easier to read on the train or spread out on my desk.  I think you will get to enjoy the smaller size.  I subscribe to the online version of the WSJ and rarely see the printed version.  When I do, it seems huge.  By the way, don&#039;t bank on a lower price.

Welcome back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few years ago they shrank the SF Chronicle and I love it!  It&#8217;s easier to read on the train or spread out on my desk.  I think you will get to enjoy the smaller size.  I subscribe to the online version of the WSJ and rarely see the printed version.  When I do, it seems huge.  By the way, don&#8217;t bank on a lower price.</p>
<p>Welcome back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
