<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dow Jones is Starting to Tick me Off!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allfinancialmatters.com/2006/01/09/dow-jones-is-starting-to-tick-me-off/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2006/01/09/dow-jones-is-starting-to-tick-me-off/</link>
	<description>A personal finance blog dedicated to discussing such topics as budgeting, asset allocation, 401K, IRA, cash flow, insurance, financial planning, portfolio management, and other areas in personal finance.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:48:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex_Br</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2006/01/09/dow-jones-is-starting-to-tick-me-off/comment-page-1/#comment-1500</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex_Br</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allthingsfinancialblog.com/2006/01/09/dow-jones-is-starting-to-tick-me-off/#comment-1500</guid>
		<description>WSJ is angering millions of customers in a stupid move that could cost them a lot of money.   I sugest we file a complaint with the FTC

https://rn.ftc.gov/pls/dod/wsolcq$.startup?Z_ORG_CODE=PU01

It smells class action..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WSJ is angering millions of customers in a stupid move that could cost them a lot of money.   I sugest we file a complaint with the FTC</p>
<p><a href="https://rn.ftc.gov/pls/dod/wsolcq$.startup?Z_ORG_CODE=PU01" rel="nofollow">https://rn.ftc.gov/pls/dod/wsolcq$.startup?Z_ORG_CODE=PU01</a></p>
<p>It smells class action..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2006/01/09/dow-jones-is-starting-to-tick-me-off/comment-page-1/#comment-1028</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allthingsfinancialblog.com/2006/01/09/dow-jones-is-starting-to-tick-me-off/#comment-1028</guid>
		<description>I suggest contacting the WSJ and complain. I plan to as I noticed the online WSJ sub fee has gone from $79 to $99. If the WSJ becomes irrelevant I&#039;d rather it be because we complained and they didn&#039;t listen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest contacting the WSJ and complain. I plan to as I noticed the online WSJ sub fee has gone from $79 to $99. If the WSJ becomes irrelevant I&#8217;d rather it be because we complained and they didn&#8217;t listen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Suter</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2006/01/09/dow-jones-is-starting-to-tick-me-off/comment-page-1/#comment-1023</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Suter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allthingsfinancialblog.com/2006/01/09/dow-jones-is-starting-to-tick-me-off/#comment-1023</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m an online subscriber to the WSJ. In december DJ sent an email telling me that records (!) show them that I access mainly Barrons (which is not true). So from january 8 they will consider me a Barrons subscriber. But they have a marvellous offer: for only 20$ I can access again the WSJ, too.
I told them that I will have none of this, but since yesterday I can&#039;t access the Journal.
I think they try to teach me, that I really don&#039;t need another financial paper besides the FT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m an online subscriber to the WSJ. In december DJ sent an email telling me that records (!) show them that I access mainly Barrons (which is not true). So from january 8 they will consider me a Barrons subscriber. But they have a marvellous offer: for only 20$ I can access again the WSJ, too.<br />
I told them that I will have none of this, but since yesterday I can&#8217;t access the Journal.<br />
I think they try to teach me, that I really don&#8217;t need another financial paper besides the FT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2006/01/09/dow-jones-is-starting-to-tick-me-off/comment-page-1/#comment-1019</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 03:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allthingsfinancialblog.com/2006/01/09/dow-jones-is-starting-to-tick-me-off/#comment-1019</guid>
		<description>I have an online WSJ subscription, and when I went to access Barron&#039;s they want more money.
I am getting to the point where I will probably cancel my subscription.  It&#039;s not like I read it every day anyhow.  They keep raising prices, when the are so many other good/free sources competing for my attention.  If they keep this up, they will make themselves irrelevant as less people pay attention to what they have to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an online WSJ subscription, and when I went to access Barron&#8217;s they want more money.<br />
I am getting to the point where I will probably cancel my subscription.  It&#8217;s not like I read it every day anyhow.  They keep raising prices, when the are so many other good/free sources competing for my attention.  If they keep this up, they will make themselves irrelevant as less people pay attention to what they have to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2006/01/09/dow-jones-is-starting-to-tick-me-off/comment-page-1/#comment-1016</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allthingsfinancialblog.com/2006/01/09/dow-jones-is-starting-to-tick-me-off/#comment-1016</guid>
		<description>What do you mean?  I was just about to get an online subscription to Barron&#039;s.  What&#039;s this new requirement?  DCan you still get Wall Street Journal Online and get access to Barron&#039;s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you mean?  I was just about to get an online subscription to Barron&#8217;s.  What&#8217;s this new requirement?  DCan you still get Wall Street Journal Online and get access to Barron&#8217;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

