<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Average vs. Geometric Average</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allfinancialmatters.com/2006/06/06/average-vs-geometric-average/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2006/06/06/average-vs-geometric-average/</link>
	<description>A personal finance blog dedicated to discussing such topics as budgeting, asset allocation, 401K, IRA, cash flow, insurance, financial planning, portfolio management, and other areas in personal finance.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:56:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Finance 101</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2006/06/06/average-vs-geometric-average/comment-page-1/#comment-440696</link>
		<dc:creator>Finance 101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsfinancialblog.com/?p=807#comment-440696</guid>
		<description>Just remember, the geometric mean only informs you about the historical return.  It is not a good predictor of next year&#039;s return and therefore should not be used to compare across asset classes.  For more information, see:

Blume, Marshall, 1974, Unbiased estimators of longrun expected rates of return</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just remember, the geometric mean only informs you about the historical return.  It is not a good predictor of next year&#8217;s return and therefore should not be used to compare across asset classes.  For more information, see:</p>
<p>Blume, Marshall, 1974, Unbiased estimators of longrun expected rates of return</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2006/06/06/average-vs-geometric-average/comment-page-1/#comment-415797</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsfinancialblog.com/?p=807#comment-415797</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great explanation of geometric vs arithmetic average!

It makes sense though when you stop to think about it... every year you multiply your returns by the relevant factor, since this will give the increase (or decrease) in your returns achieved over that period. When multiplying however you are not simply multiplying the amount you initially put in but you are also multiplying the factors from previous years and hence a factor from a particular year influences all the factors that came before it, so you simply can not use the arithmetic average. The factors are not independent! I hope this makes sense, I tried my best...it&#039;s still a great article though so thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great explanation of geometric vs arithmetic average!</p>
<p>It makes sense though when you stop to think about it&#8230; every year you multiply your returns by the relevant factor, since this will give the increase (or decrease) in your returns achieved over that period. When multiplying however you are not simply multiplying the amount you initially put in but you are also multiplying the factors from previous years and hence a factor from a particular year influences all the factors that came before it, so you simply can not use the arithmetic average. The factors are not independent! I hope this makes sense, I tried my best&#8230;it&#8217;s still a great article though so thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fianance</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2006/06/06/average-vs-geometric-average/comment-page-1/#comment-323957</link>
		<dc:creator>Fianance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 02:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsfinancialblog.com/?p=807#comment-323957</guid>
		<description>Geometric method is by far superior than arithmetic average!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geometric method is by far superior than arithmetic average!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linea</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2006/06/06/average-vs-geometric-average/comment-page-1/#comment-294362</link>
		<dc:creator>Linea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsfinancialblog.com/?p=807#comment-294362</guid>
		<description>Thank u, now it all make a whole lot of sense....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank u, now it all make a whole lot of sense&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What a Difference a Year Makes!&#8212;AllFinancialMatters</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2006/06/06/average-vs-geometric-average/comment-page-1/#comment-220427</link>
		<dc:creator>What a Difference a Year Makes!&#8212;AllFinancialMatters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 06:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsfinancialblog.com/?p=807#comment-220427</guid>
		<description>[...] Now, this graphic shows you how 2007&#8217;s returns impacted the annualized rate of return (also called the geometric average) for the indexes: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now, this graphic shows you how 2007&#8217;s returns impacted the annualized rate of return (also called the geometric average) for the indexes: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benjamin</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2006/06/06/average-vs-geometric-average/comment-page-1/#comment-87130</link>
		<dc:creator>benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 07:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsfinancialblog.com/?p=807#comment-87130</guid>
		<description>Very kind of you. I then got a clear idea of what they are.
Thank you for all you have done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very kind of you. I then got a clear idea of what they are.<br />
Thank you for all you have done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: george hayduke</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2006/06/06/average-vs-geometric-average/comment-page-1/#comment-65819</link>
		<dc:creator>george hayduke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsfinancialblog.com/?p=807#comment-65819</guid>
		<description>excelent analysis. you have to use georeturns!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excelent analysis. you have to use georeturns!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2006/06/06/average-vs-geometric-average/comment-page-1/#comment-27072</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsfinancialblog.com/?p=807#comment-27072</guid>
		<description>Ah so good to have found this. was trying to work out geometric average of Net income growth with negitve numbers and was not working. Using your method I got the answer and my sanity. 

Great work!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah so good to have found this. was trying to work out geometric average of Net income growth with negitve numbers and was not working. Using your method I got the answer and my sanity. </p>
<p>Great work!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2006/06/06/average-vs-geometric-average/comment-page-1/#comment-7028</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsfinancialblog.com/?p=807#comment-7028</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Average vs. Geometric Average&lt;/strong&gt;

Be sure you are using geometric means when reporting your returns.  This article tells you how and why it is important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Average vs. Geometric Average</strong></p>
<p>Be sure you are using geometric means when reporting your returns.  This article tells you how and why it is important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fivecentnickel.com</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2006/06/06/average-vs-geometric-average/comment-page-1/#comment-7007</link>
		<dc:creator>fivecentnickel.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 23:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsfinancialblog.com/?p=807#comment-7007</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Weekly Roundup - 06/09/06&lt;/strong&gt;

Here&#8217;s a quick look at a few things from the MoneyBlogNetwork (and beyond) that caught my eye over the past week&#8230; 

MightyBargainHunter asks if one should pay down their mortgage or sock extra savings away in their ING Direct account (click...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Weekly Roundup &#8211; 06/09/06</strong></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a quick look at a few things from the MoneyBlogNetwork (and beyond) that caught my eye over the past week&#8230; </p>
<p>MightyBargainHunter asks if one should pay down their mortgage or sock extra savings away in their ING Direct account (click&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
