<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2006 Benchmark Index Performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/01/04/2006-benchmark-index-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/01/04/2006-benchmark-index-performance/</link>
	<description>A personal finance blog dedicated to discussing such topics as budgeting, asset allocation, 401K, IRA, cash flow, insurance, financial planning, portfolio management, and other areas in personal finance.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:32:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/01/04/2006-benchmark-index-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-60608</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1468#comment-60608</guid>
		<description>Kurt - Ken Fisher&#039;s new book &quot;The Only Three Questions That Count&quot; has some interesting thoughts on this.  In fact, I haven&#039;t finished the book yet, but it&#039;s been a very interesting read so far and I recommend it (not in the sense that I agree with him or not, just that it is thought provoking and looks at many common ideas from a different angle).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kurt &#8211; Ken Fisher&#8217;s new book &#8220;The Only Three Questions That Count&#8221; has some interesting thoughts on this.  In fact, I haven&#8217;t finished the book yet, but it&#8217;s been a very interesting read so far and I recommend it (not in the sense that I agree with him or not, just that it is thought provoking and looks at many common ideas from a different angle).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kurt</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/01/04/2006-benchmark-index-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-60275</link>
		<dc:creator>kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 02:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1468#comment-60275</guid>
		<description>Another good year for value.  Wonder when the cycle rolls over?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another good year for value.  Wonder when the cycle rolls over?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLP</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/01/04/2006-benchmark-index-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-60258</link>
		<dc:creator>JLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 23:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1468#comment-60258</guid>
		<description>Rob,

Yeah, that it is strange.  I suppose it is due to the fact that the indexes are all different brands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob,</p>
<p>Yeah, that it is strange.  I suppose it is due to the fact that the indexes are all different brands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/01/04/2006-benchmark-index-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-60249</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1468#comment-60249</guid>
		<description>I know we&#039;re not comparing apples to apples because the indexes are different, but isn&#039;t it a little odd that large caps returned 15.8%, mid caps 15.8%, and small caps 18.4%, but the broad market Wilshire 5000 was only 15.3%?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know we&#8217;re not comparing apples to apples because the indexes are different, but isn&#8217;t it a little odd that large caps returned 15.8%, mid caps 15.8%, and small caps 18.4%, but the broad market Wilshire 5000 was only 15.3%?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kurt</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/01/04/2006-benchmark-index-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-60218</link>
		<dc:creator>kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1468#comment-60218</guid>
		<description>According to LEH, the muni returns are much lower than that (4.4% LTM): http://www.lehman.com/LL_S/public/publicsite/bondindex.html

Likewise, morningstar reports a lower number as well.
http://news.morningstar.com/index/indexReturn.html

I have a feeling the data is flawed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to LEH, the muni returns are much lower than that (4.4% LTM): <a href="http://www.lehman.com/LL_S/public/publicsite/bondindex.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lehman.com/LL_S/public/publicsite/bondindex.html</a></p>
<p>Likewise, morningstar reports a lower number as well.<br />
<a href="http://news.morningstar.com/index/indexReturn.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.morningstar.com/index/indexReturn.html</a></p>
<p>I have a feeling the data is flawed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

