<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phaseouts For Tax Benefits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/01/10/phaseouts-for-tax-benefits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/01/10/phaseouts-for-tax-benefits/</link>
	<description>A personal finance blog dedicated to discussing such topics as budgeting, asset allocation, 401K, IRA, cash flow, insurance, financial planning, portfolio management, and other areas in personal finance.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:56:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fivecentnickel.com</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/01/10/phaseouts-for-tax-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-89105</link>
		<dc:creator>fivecentnickel.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1479#comment-89105</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the Roth phaseout is really irksome, because you&#039;re not actually dodging current taxes when you contribute to a Roth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the Roth phaseout is really irksome, because you&#8217;re not actually dodging current taxes when you contribute to a Roth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Money Finance</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/01/10/phaseouts-for-tax-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-62201</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Money Finance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1479#comment-62201</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Star Money Articles for the Week of Jan. 8&lt;/strong&gt;

Here are interesting posts and news this week from the MoneyBlogNetwork members and beyond: Consumerism Commentary is covering the US News Annual Investing Guide. AllFinancialMatters details the phaseouts for tax benefits. MightyBargainHunter lists 16 ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Star Money Articles for the Week of Jan. 8</strong></p>
<p>Here are interesting posts and news this week from the MoneyBlogNetwork members and beyond: Consumerism Commentary is covering the US News Annual Investing Guide. AllFinancialMatters details the phaseouts for tax benefits. MightyBargainHunter lists 16 &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/01/10/phaseouts-for-tax-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-62142</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1479#comment-62142</guid>
		<description>Amen Sam! That&#039;s my pet peeve as well. Stay-at-home parents who are married to high-earners are screwed when it comes to saving (tax-deferred) for retirement. Add the 70-whatever cents (women) earn on the dollar and it&#039;s no wonder so many elderly women live in poverty...Hope I can sell pencils (or something )on the streetcorner in 40 years...

JLP, thanks for the nod...I&#039;ve been busier than sin...which is pretty busy as we all know!

xoxo, SLM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen Sam! That&#8217;s my pet peeve as well. Stay-at-home parents who are married to high-earners are screwed when it comes to saving (tax-deferred) for retirement. Add the 70-whatever cents (women) earn on the dollar and it&#8217;s no wonder so many elderly women live in poverty&#8230;Hope I can sell pencils (or something )on the streetcorner in 40 years&#8230;</p>
<p>JLP, thanks for the nod&#8230;I&#8217;ve been busier than sin&#8230;which is pretty busy as we all know!</p>
<p>xoxo, SLM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/01/10/phaseouts-for-tax-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-61979</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1479#comment-61979</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t hold my breath waiting for the phase-outs to be phased out.  If anything, I think the new Congress will be looking to do the opposite, tilt the tax code away from high earners toward low earners.

It seems only fair to at least index the phase-outs for inflation, but again I don&#039;t expect this to happen.  My pet peeve is the phase-out for contributions to a Roth IRA, (or a standard IRA for that matter).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t hold my breath waiting for the phase-outs to be phased out.  If anything, I think the new Congress will be looking to do the opposite, tilt the tax code away from high earners toward low earners.</p>
<p>It seems only fair to at least index the phase-outs for inflation, but again I don&#8217;t expect this to happen.  My pet peeve is the phase-out for contributions to a Roth IRA, (or a standard IRA for that matter).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dus10</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/01/10/phaseouts-for-tax-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-61963</link>
		<dc:creator>Dus10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1479#comment-61963</guid>
		<description>To add...

The idea that Charlie Rangle has been throwing around about exempting the first X dollars of your income from FICA would have a great impact than get rid of these phase outs.  They have mentioned exempting the first $10K of everyone&#039;s income, and they have mentioned bumping the SS cap up $10K.  However, I don&#039;t think they could recover the $10K exemption even if they got rid of the SS cap all together.

It is just more political posturing to buy votes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To add&#8230;</p>
<p>The idea that Charlie Rangle has been throwing around about exempting the first X dollars of your income from FICA would have a great impact than get rid of these phase outs.  They have mentioned exempting the first $10K of everyone&#8217;s income, and they have mentioned bumping the SS cap up $10K.  However, I don&#8217;t think they could recover the $10K exemption even if they got rid of the SS cap all together.</p>
<p>It is just more political posturing to buy votes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dus10</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/01/10/phaseouts-for-tax-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-61962</link>
		<dc:creator>Dus10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1479#comment-61962</guid>
		<description>The Fair Tax!

And would they really be missing out on billions?  Really, there are not all that many people (relative to the size of the population) that earn above those figures.  Withstanding the itemization, we are only talking about fairly small sums of money when you are looking at it in a macro sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fair Tax!</p>
<p>And would they really be missing out on billions?  Really, there are not all that many people (relative to the size of the population) that earn above those figures.  Withstanding the itemization, we are only talking about fairly small sums of money when you are looking at it in a macro sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Financial Freedumb</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/01/10/phaseouts-for-tax-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-61651</link>
		<dc:creator>Financial Freedumb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1479#comment-61651</guid>
		<description>&quot;All of this is just another reason why we need to scrap our tax code and come up with something that is simple, transparent, and fair!&quot;

Yes!  One day I hope...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;All of this is just another reason why we need to scrap our tax code and come up with something that is simple, transparent, and fair!&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes!  One day I hope&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samerwriter</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/01/10/phaseouts-for-tax-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-61645</link>
		<dc:creator>samerwriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1479#comment-61645</guid>
		<description>My prescription for taxcode simplification: Stop patching the AMT. It&#039;s simpler to calculate one&#039;s AMT liability than non-AMT liability.

The phaseouts are a major pain. They make it significantly more difficult to accurately calculate withholding, especially if one has significant variable income (bonuses, stock options, etc..) that are not known ahead of time.

There are many arguments for over-withholding (despite the obvious drawbacks), and the phaseouts are one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My prescription for taxcode simplification: Stop patching the AMT. It&#8217;s simpler to calculate one&#8217;s AMT liability than non-AMT liability.</p>
<p>The phaseouts are a major pain. They make it significantly more difficult to accurately calculate withholding, especially if one has significant variable income (bonuses, stock options, etc..) that are not known ahead of time.</p>
<p>There are many arguments for over-withholding (despite the obvious drawbacks), and the phaseouts are one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BD</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/01/10/phaseouts-for-tax-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-61622</link>
		<dc:creator>BD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1479#comment-61622</guid>
		<description>Are these the income limits for married taxpayers?  How are they different for singles?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are these the income limits for married taxpayers?  How are they different for singles?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
