Subscribe to AFM


Site Sponsors

AFM in the Media


Money Magazine May 2008

Real Simple March 2008

Blogroll (Daily Reads)

Blog Stats


Search


« More on Social Security - How I See It | Main | How Does Your Bonus Compare With These? »

‘Lazy Portfolios’ Beat the S&P 500 Again!

By JLP | January 20, 2007

IMPORTANT NOTE: You’ll probably notice that only one of the portfolios listed below actually outperformed the S&P 500 in 2006. The title for the post is based on the total return for the portfolios over the last 5 years. Over the last 5 years the lazy portfolios beat the S&P 500 hands down. To see the results over the last five years, click here.

Paul Ferrell over at MarketWatch wrote an article profiling five ‘Lazy Portfolios,’ which are portfolios created for both simplicity and low cost. The purpose of the lazy portfolios is to give investors a well-rounded portfolio with as little work as possible. All of the portfolios use Vanguard funds (no exchange-traded funds). Anyway, here are the results for 2006:



ARONSON FAMILY PORTFOLIO

11 Funds

Fund

Ticker

Allo-
cation

2006
Return

Vanguard 500 Index

VFINX

15.00%

15.64%

Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index

VEIEX

20.00%

29.07%

Vanguard European Stock Index

VEURX

5.00%

33.12%

Vanguard Extended Market Index

VEXMX

10.00%

14.27%

Vanguard High-Yield Corporate

VWEHX

5.00%

8.24%

Vanguard Inflation-Protected Securities

VIPSX

10.00%

.43%

Vanguard Long-Term U.S. Treasury

VUSTX

5.00%

1.74%

Vanguard Pacific Stock Index

VPACX

15.00%

11.81%

Vanguard Small Cap Growth

VISGX

5.00%

11.95%

Vanguard Small Cap Value Index

VISVX

5.00%

19.24%

Vanguard Total Stock Market Index

VTSMX

5.00%

15.51%

Total Portfolio Return

15.89%

S&P 500 Index

15.79%

I don’t quite understand why the Aronson portfolio has so many funds. With the diversity presented, it seems like the Total Market Index fund is unnecessary.



NO-BRAINER PORTFOLIO
William Bernstein’s Portfolio

9 Funds

Fund

Ticker

Allo-
cation

2006
Return

Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index

VEIEX

5.00%

29.07%

Vanguard European Stock Index

VEURX

5.00%

33.12%

Vanguard Pacific Stock Index

VPACX

5.00%

11.81%

Vanguard REIT Index

VGSIX

5.00%

35.07%

Vanguard Short-Term Investment Grade Index

VFSTX

40.00%

4.99%

Vanguard Small Cap Index

NAESX

5.00%

15.66%

Vanguard Small Cap Value Index

VISVX

10.00%

19.24%

Vanguard Total Stock Market Index

VTSMX

15.00%

15.51%

Vanguard Value Index

VIPSX

10.00%

22.15%

Total Portfolio Return

14.70%

S&P 500 Index

15.79%



COFFEEHOUSE PORTFOLIO
Bill Schultheis’ Portfolio

7 Funds

Fund

Ticker

Allo-
cation

2006
Return

Vanguard 500 Index

VFINX

10.00%

15.64%

Vanguard REIT Index

VGSIX

10.00%

35.07%

Vanguard Small Cap Index

NAESX

10.00%

15.66%

Vanguard Small Cap Value Index

VISVX

10.00%

19.24%

Vanguard Total Bond Market Index

VBMFX

40.00%

4.27%

Vanguard Total International Stock Index

VGTSX

10.00%

26.64%

Vanguard Value Index

VIPSX

10.00%

22.15%

Total Portfolio Return

15.15%

S&P 500 Index

15.79%



YALE UNIVERSITY LAZY PORTFOLIO
David Swensen’s Portfolio

5 Funds

Fund

Ticker

Allo-
cation

2006
Return

Vanguard Inflation-Protected Securities

VIPSX

15.00%

.43%

Vanguard REIT Index

VGSIX

20.00%

35.07%

Vanguard Short-Term Treasury Index

VFISX

15.00%

3.77%

Vanguard Total International Stock Index

VGTSX

20.00%

26.64%

Vanguard Total Stock Market Index

VTSMX

30.00%

15.51%

Total Portfolio Return

17.62%

S&P 500 Index

15.79%



MARGARITAVILLE PORTFOLIO
Scott Burns’ Portfolio

3 Funds

Fund

Ticker

Allo-
cation

2006
Return

Vanguard Inflation-Protected Securities

VIPSX

33.30%

.43%

Vanguard Total International Stock Index

VGTSX

33.30%

26.64%

Vanguard Total Stock Market Index

VTSMX

33.30%

15.51%

Total Portfolio Return

14.19%

S&P 500 Index

15.79%

That’s it. For more information on the portfolios, read Paul Ferrell’s article.

Topics: Index Funds, Investing |


8 Responses to “‘Lazy Portfolios’ Beat the S&P 500 Again!”

  1. Wanda Says:
    January 20th, 2007 at 7:27 pm

    The Lazy Portfolio seemed to be aimed at someone closer to retirement, w/ the treasury index and the inflation-protected securities. Do you know if there is a Lazy Portfolio for young 20-somethings? :)

  2. JLP Says:
    January 20th, 2007 at 9:03 pm

    Wanda,

    You could simply take one of the portfolios and either reduce or eliminate the bond portion to make it more aggressive for a younger person.

  3. Keith Cash Says:
    January 20th, 2007 at 11:38 pm

    Count me in for the lazy portfolio, I will try to use this year.

    Cheers

  4. jr Says:
    January 21st, 2007 at 8:08 am

    The lazy portfolio allows for more aggressiveness, just adjust the bond/equity ratio accordingly. BTW: if you haven’t ready _Unconventional Success_, pick it up today (right after you read _A Random Walk Down Wall Street_).

  5. fin_indie Says:
    January 21st, 2007 at 1:40 pm

    Remember! Past performance is not an indicator of future returns. This was a good year, so returns were much higher than normal across the board. Don’t necessarily expect 17% if you implement the Yale portfolio this year.

  6. JLP Says:
    January 21st, 2007 at 1:58 pm

    fin_indie,

    True. But also don’t expect 15.8% from the S&P 500.

  7. Lazy Man and Money Says:
    January 21st, 2007 at 2:40 pm

    I think the reason for the Total Market in the first portfolio would be to get some mid-cap exposure. I would boost this up to 10% and lower the Vanguard 500 to 10%. Then you get 10% in small caps, 10% in large caps, and 10% in everything - probably leading something like 13% large, 13% small and 4% mid-cap. I generally like more mid-cap and would make the Total Index a bigger portion of the portfolio.

  8. Posts I Enjoyed Last Week - The Sun’s Financial Diary - Accumulating wealth is like building The Great Wall, one brick at a time Says:
    January 22nd, 2007 at 10:50 am

    [...] Jonathan at MyMoneyBlog starts a series of portfolio analysis based on some widely used models. And sometimes, you can afford to be lazy and still beat the market, according to JLP. [...]

Comments