Subscribe to AFM


Site Sponsors

Some of my Friends are Authors

AFM in the Media


Money Magazine May 2008

Real Simple March 2008

Blogroll (Daily Reads)

Blog Stats


Search


« 5 Things You Probably Don’t Knoweth About Me | Main | Reminder to Other Bloggers »

The Impact of a Couple of Bad Years!

By JLP | January 26, 2007

Take a look at the following graphic, which is the year-by-year total return performance of the S&P 500 Index from 1987 - 2006:

S&P 500 Index Annual Total Returns 1987 - 2006

Now imagine that you had invested $10,000 at the beginning of 1987. NOTE: We are using the returns of the S&P 500 Index itself, which does not include any sort of managment expenses. By the end of 1999, your $10,000 would have grown to $86,108 giving you an annualized return of 18.01%:

S&P 500 Index Portfolio Performance

The next three years wouldn’t have been as pleasant as you watched your account value drop back down to $53,718 by the end of 2002, a decrease of 38.24% from the peak. OUCH!

S&P 500 Index Portfolio Performance

It would then take over six years for the portfolio to get back up to the previous peak, which it finally did do sometime during 2006.

S&P 500 Index Portfolio Performance

So, what’s my point(s) with all this?

1. Things tend to revert back to the mean. Since its creation in 1957*, the S&P 500 index has average around 10%. Although great at the time, returns in excess of 10% should be considered gravy and the investor should expect that over the long run, their rate of return is going to average 10%. The same can be said for down years.

2. After a losing year, it takes a greater rate of return to get you back where you started. In other words, if you lose 25% one year, you need a 33.33% return the next year just to get you back to where you were before. For example:

Say you have a $100,000 and experience a 25% decline, leaving you with $75,000. To get back to $100,000, you need a return of 33.33%:

($100,000 ÷ $75,000) - 1 = .3333 or 33.33%

Another way to look at is during the three declining years (2000 - 2002), the average loss was 14.55%. Over the next 3 years (2003 - 2005), the average gain was 14.39% and yet the portfolio was still worth $5,699 LESS than it was at the end of 1999.

Interesting stuff, don’t you think? It’s amazing what you can learn when you look at the numbers.

*The Index dates back to 1923 but the index as we know it today (containing 500 companies) dates back to 1957.

Topics: Index Funds, Investing |