Subscribe to AFM

Subscribe to AllFinancialMatters
by Email

All Financial Matters

Promote Your Page Too

The American's Creed

Site Sponsors

AFM in the Media

Money Magazine May 2008

Real Simple March 2008

Blogroll (Daily Reads)

« | Main | »

Why 12b-1 Fees Are Evil!

By JLP | January 31, 2007

First off, what’s a 12b-1 fee? According to Investor Words, a 12b-1 fee is:

An extra fee charged by some mutual funds to cover promotion, distributions, marketing expenses, and sometimes commissions to brokers. A genuine no-load fund does not have 12b-1 fees, although some funds calling themselves “no-load” do have 12b-1 fees (as do some load funds). 12b-1 fee information is disclosed in a fund’s prospectus, is included in the stated expense ratio, and is usually less than 1%.

So, 12b-1 fees cover promotion, distribution, marketing expenses, and sometimes commissions to brokers. None of these, aside from broker compensation, add value to the existing shareholders. That’s what is evil about 12b-1 fees.

How much are 12b-1 fees?

A 12b-1 fee is usually 25 basis points (.25%) and is charged annually. Doesn’t sound like much does it? Well, believe me, it adds up! Take a look at the following graphic. The first one is for a one-year time period. The second graphic is for a 10-year time period.

12b-1 Fees

12b-1 Fees

As your account value grows, the 12b-1 fee (which is a percentage of your account value) grows too. Over the long-term it can really add up.

That’s not all, the better rate of return you get, the more you pay in 12b-1 fees as this graphic shows:

12b-1 Fees

To arrive at these numbers, I assumed an investment of $100,000. I then ran the numbers without a 12b-1 fee to get an end result. Then I ran the numbers again minus the 12b-1 fee and subtracted that result from the first result. Make sense? Basically, I used the same method as the first two graphics, but arranged the results differently for easy comparison.

The bottom line

In my opinion, 12b-1 fees do not add value unless they are used to compensate a broker (as long as that broker is earning it). If you are investing on your own through no-load mutual funds, then I would think twice before buying a fund with a 12b-1 fee. Of course the choice is yours. After all, it is your money.

Topics: Investing, Mutual Funds | 3 Comments »

3 Responses to “Why 12b-1 Fees Are Evil!”

  1. » Weekly Roundup - 02/02/07 @ Says:
    February 2nd, 2007 at 10:31 pm

    […] JLP explains why 12B-1 fees are evil. […]

  2. » Weekly Blog Roundup, Coin Collecting Edition on Consumerism Commentary: A Personal Finance Blog Says:
    February 4th, 2007 at 10:25 pm

    […] AllFinancialMatters explains why 12b fees are evil. […]

  3. AllFinancialMatters » Blog Archive » Not All S&P 500 Index Mutual Funds Are Created Equal! Says:
    February 14th, 2007 at 1:04 am

    […] These numbers really shouldn’t surprise us. The main reason the first two classes are so much more expensive is that they have higher 12b-1 fees to compensate the broker. Eventually the back-end load mutual fund will revert to the same management fee schedule as the front-end load mutual fund, which will mean lower fees. What I found interesting was the fact that the no-load class was actually cheaper on average than the institutional class. The level load fund will remain the same for as long as the mutual fund is owned. […]