Search


Subscribe to AFM


Subscribe to AllFinancialMatters
by Email

All Financial Matters

Promote Your Page Too

The American's Creed

Site Sponsors

Books I Recommend


AFM in the Media


Money Magazine May 2008

Real Simple March 2008

Blogroll (Daily Reads)

« | Main | »

Updated Periodic Table of iShares ETF Returns

By JLP | February 5, 2007

Here’s an updated ranking of the iShares sector funds that I posted about last week. This ranking includes the following:

1. The 10 iShares sector funds of the Dow Jones Total Market Index

2. The iShares Dow Jones Real Estate Index Fund (IYR)

3. The iShares MSCI EAFE Fund (EFA) – This is an international fund

4. The iShares Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index Fund

Now for the rankings:

Periodic Table of iShares Returns

Now, here’s how they would have performed as a portfolio:

I constructed two different portfolios.

The Allocated Portfolio (Rebalanced Annually):

2001

70% – iShares DJ Sector Indexes (7% in each fund)
10% – iShares DJ Real Estate Index Fund
20% – Fixed Income

2002

50% – iShares DJ Sector Indexes (5% in each fund)
10% – iShares DJ Real Estate Index Fund
20% – iShares MSCI EAFE Fund
20% – Fixed Income

2003 – 2006

50% – iShares DJ Sector Indexes (5% in each fund)
10% – iShares DJ Real Estate Index Fund
20% – iShares MSCI EAFE Fund
20% – iShares Lehman Bros. Aggregate Bond Index Fund

The reason for the different portfolios is that the iShare funds weren’t available in every year.

Now, here’s how the portfolio would have performed:

iShares Allocated Portfolio Returns

The Equal-Weighted Portfolio (Rebalanced Annually):

2001

83.3% – iShares DJ Sector Indexes (8.33% in each fund)
8.33% – iShares DJ Real Estate Index Fund
8.33% – Fixed Income

2002

79.6% – iShares DJ Sector Indexes (7.96% in each fund)
7.96% – iShares DJ Real Estate Index Fund
7.96% – iShares MSCI EAFE Fund
7.96% – Fixed Income

2003 – 2006

79.6% – iShares DJ Sector Indexes (7.96% in each fund)
7.96% – iShares DJ Real Estate Index Fund
7.96% – iShares MSCI EAFE Fund
7.96% – iShares Lehman Bros. Aggregate Bond Index Fund

As the graphic below shows, this portfolio’s results were nearly identical to the Allocated Portfolio:

iShares Equal-Weighted Portfolio Returns

A 7.49% annualized rate of return doesn’t sound that great. However, it is important to note that 2001 and 2002 were murder on stock returns. It is also important to note that the portfolios were bouyed somewhat by the terrific performance of the Dow Jones Real Estate Index Fund, which had an annualized return of 19.99% over the last six years.

Oh, and if you’re interested, you can download an Excel file I put together with the annual returns.

Topics: Exchange-Traded Funds, Index Funds, Investing | 6 Comments »


6 Responses to “Updated Periodic Table of iShares ETF Returns”

  1. Nagel Says:
    February 6th, 2007 at 5:51 am

    Those charts are telling in that you see that top investments one year can be at the bottom the next; and vice versa.

    Some comparisons and contrasts of index funds and etfs:

    http://finance.webaplex.com/05/eft-or-index-fund/

  2. Bob Says:
    February 6th, 2007 at 6:45 am

    Your annualized return is good but have you thought about giving it a boost with some stocks from the precious metals sector?

  3. Savvy Steward Says:
    February 6th, 2007 at 12:34 pm

    Thanks for adding IYR to the chart. Looks like its been performing well for the past few years.

  4. Rob Says:
    February 6th, 2007 at 5:45 pm

    If you were adequately invested globally you would have done a lot better, as can generally be seen by the performance of EFA each year. Of course this can change, but my general view is that 20% international is insufficient and 8% international is DEFINITELY insufficient.

  5. Rob Says:
    February 6th, 2007 at 5:47 pm

    I would also work in some emerging markets.

  6. JLP Says:
    February 6th, 2007 at 5:55 pm

    Rob,

    Actually, over the last 20 years, the MSCI EAFE Index hasn’t done all that well (as you can see here). Yes, it has been stellar over the last 4 years but who knows how long that will continue.

Comments