<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interest-Only Mortgage Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/04/02/interest-only-mortgage-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/04/02/interest-only-mortgage-update/</link>
	<description>A personal finance blog dedicated to discussing such topics as budgeting, asset allocation, 401K, IRA, cash flow, insurance, financial planning, portfolio management, and other areas in personal finance.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 22:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Question From a Reader: What to do With My Mortgage?&#8212;AllFinancialMatters</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/04/02/interest-only-mortgage-update/comment-page-1/#comment-226402</link>
		<dc:creator>Question From a Reader: What to do With My Mortgage?&#8212;AllFinancialMatters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1688#comment-226402</guid>
		<description>[...] Interest-Only Mortgage Update [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Interest-Only Mortgage Update [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AllFinancialMatters &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Top 5 Reasons to Pay Off Your Mortgage?</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/04/02/interest-only-mortgage-update/comment-page-1/#comment-104249</link>
		<dc:creator>AllFinancialMatters &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Top 5 Reasons to Pay Off Your Mortgage?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1688#comment-104249</guid>
		<description>[...] Interest-Only Mortgage Update [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Interest-Only Mortgage Update [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dnis</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/04/02/interest-only-mortgage-update/comment-page-1/#comment-97559</link>
		<dc:creator>Dnis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 04:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1688#comment-97559</guid>
		<description>I was recently told of a 40yr &quot;fixed&quot; interest only loan.  What I don&#039;t understand is how I could possibly only pay interest for 40yrs?  Isn&#039;t there a maximimun amount of interest that would be written on the settlement agreement, and wouldn&#039;t that mean I&#039;d actually start paying on the principle before 40yrs is up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was recently told of a 40yr &#8220;fixed&#8221; interest only loan.  What I don&#8217;t understand is how I could possibly only pay interest for 40yrs?  Isn&#8217;t there a maximimun amount of interest that would be written on the settlement agreement, and wouldn&#8217;t that mean I&#8217;d actually start paying on the principle before 40yrs is up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mighty Bargain Hunter &#187; Roundup for week of 1 April 2007</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/04/02/interest-only-mortgage-update/comment-page-1/#comment-96549</link>
		<dc:creator>Mighty Bargain Hunter &#187; Roundup for week of 1 April 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1688#comment-96549</guid>
		<description>[...] All Financial Matters might tip his hat to interest-only mortgages under certain circumstances. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] All Financial Matters might tip his hat to interest-only mortgages under certain circumstances. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AllFinancialMatters &#187; Blog Archive &#187; JLP Responds - Interest-Only Mortgages</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/04/02/interest-only-mortgage-update/comment-page-1/#comment-96017</link>
		<dc:creator>AllFinancialMatters &#187; Blog Archive &#187; JLP Responds - Interest-Only Mortgages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1688#comment-96017</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m a little behind on reading the comments to some of the posts over the last few days. DB of Debt Blitzkrieg left the following comment on my Interest-Only Mortgage Update post: On the other hand it would be interesting to see where you’d be if you paid off that mortgage in 25, 20, 15, 10 and 5 years instead of either 30 year option, and then invested the full payment each month of the remaining 30 years. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m a little behind on reading the comments to some of the posts over the last few days. DB of Debt Blitzkrieg left the following comment on my Interest-Only Mortgage Update post: On the other hand it would be interesting to see where you’d be if you paid off that mortgage in 25, 20, 15, 10 and 5 years instead of either 30 year option, and then invested the full payment each month of the remaining 30 years. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lorax</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/04/02/interest-only-mortgage-update/comment-page-1/#comment-94960</link>
		<dc:creator>lorax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 01:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1688#comment-94960</guid>
		<description>&gt; A recently-retired person is still a long-term investor. Sure, it 
&gt; may hurt to take a 20 - 30% haircut but it can be overcome.

This really depends on how much you take out, and especially if you can adjust your withdrawals based on the amounts left.

Take a look at Bernstein&#039;s analysis... .  Relying on the returns of stocks can be a real problem if you get hit early in retirement.

http://www.efficientfrontier.com/ef/998/hell.htm
http://www.efficientfrontier.com/ef/101/hell101.htm
http://www.efficientfrontier.com/ef/901/hell3.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; A recently-retired person is still a long-term investor. Sure, it<br />
&gt; may hurt to take a 20 &#8211; 30% haircut but it can be overcome.</p>
<p>This really depends on how much you take out, and especially if you can adjust your withdrawals based on the amounts left.</p>
<p>Take a look at Bernstein&#8217;s analysis&#8230; .  Relying on the returns of stocks can be a real problem if you get hit early in retirement.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.efficientfrontier.com/ef/998/hell.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.efficientfrontier.com/ef/998/hell.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://www.efficientfrontier.com/ef/101/hell101.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.efficientfrontier.com/ef/101/hell101.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://www.efficientfrontier.com/ef/901/hell3.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.efficientfrontier.com/ef/901/hell3.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zen</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/04/02/interest-only-mortgage-update/comment-page-1/#comment-94924</link>
		<dc:creator>zen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 18:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1688#comment-94924</guid>
		<description>Okay, I&#039;m looking at buying a home soon - looking at this makes it seem like what I&#039;m looking at spending (160-170k). Interest only would mean much less payments up front, and also allow me to invest the difference... I&#039;ll have to weigh in on this before I commit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I&#8217;m looking at buying a home soon &#8211; looking at this makes it seem like what I&#8217;m looking at spending (160-170k). Interest only would mean much less payments up front, and also allow me to invest the difference&#8230; I&#8217;ll have to weigh in on this before I commit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: db</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/04/02/interest-only-mortgage-update/comment-page-1/#comment-94809</link>
		<dc:creator>db</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 04:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1688#comment-94809</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039;m going to start stashing my cash under my mattress. That&#039;s in my rental unit of course. I don&#039;t even own the bed. (Who needs equity?)

db</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;m going to start stashing my cash under my mattress. That&#8217;s in my rental unit of course. I don&#8217;t even own the bed. (Who needs equity?)</p>
<p>db</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLP</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/04/02/interest-only-mortgage-update/comment-page-1/#comment-94796</link>
		<dc:creator>JLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 02:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1688#comment-94796</guid>
		<description>lorax said:

&lt;em&gt;&quot;This is a common misconception about the stock market. In truth, the risk is there at any time, from short to long. Example: you planned to retire in 2001 and had almost enough in your 401k. You’d been saving for 40 years for this moment. Then in a matter of months you’ve lost 20% (if you’re lucky). It takes years for the market to recover.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

That&#039;s why understanding HOW the market works is important.  A recently-retired person is still a long-term investor.  Sure, it may hurt to take a 20 - 30% haircut but it can be overcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lorax said:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;This is a common misconception about the stock market. In truth, the risk is there at any time, from short to long. Example: you planned to retire in 2001 and had almost enough in your 401k. You’d been saving for 40 years for this moment. Then in a matter of months you’ve lost 20% (if you’re lucky). It takes years for the market to recover.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>That&#8217;s why understanding HOW the market works is important.  A recently-retired person is still a long-term investor.  Sure, it may hurt to take a 20 &#8211; 30% haircut but it can be overcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lorax</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/04/02/interest-only-mortgage-update/comment-page-1/#comment-94788</link>
		<dc:creator>lorax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 00:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1688#comment-94788</guid>
		<description>&gt; In the short run, sure you’ll have some volatility. However, 
&gt; over the long run, you’ll most likely do fine.

This is a common misconception about the stock market.  In truth, the risk is there at any time, from short to long.  Example: you planned to retire in 2001 and had almost enough in your 401k.  You&#039;d been saving for 40 years for this moment.  Then in a matter of months you&#039;ve lost 20% (if you&#039;re lucky).  It takes years for the market to recover.

That short run risk is ever-present.  Even at the end of a long haul.

And this leaves aside the problem of getting 10% (based on valuations a total stock market return will be lower) and leaves aside the US market survivorship bias.

On the other hand, if you&#039;re young enough to ride out a down market, you&#039;re in the catbird seat... so long as it happens early.

I think we&#039;ll have to agree to disagree.  I see the risk increasing since you&#039;re now buying stocks on margin.  Sure it might pay off, but then again, we might have a stock market crash and a property market crash.

To quote Kaynes: The market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; In the short run, sure you’ll have some volatility. However,<br />
&gt; over the long run, you’ll most likely do fine.</p>
<p>This is a common misconception about the stock market.  In truth, the risk is there at any time, from short to long.  Example: you planned to retire in 2001 and had almost enough in your 401k.  You&#8217;d been saving for 40 years for this moment.  Then in a matter of months you&#8217;ve lost 20% (if you&#8217;re lucky).  It takes years for the market to recover.</p>
<p>That short run risk is ever-present.  Even at the end of a long haul.</p>
<p>And this leaves aside the problem of getting 10% (based on valuations a total stock market return will be lower) and leaves aside the US market survivorship bias.</p>
<p>On the other hand, if you&#8217;re young enough to ride out a down market, you&#8217;re in the catbird seat&#8230; so long as it happens early.</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;ll have to agree to disagree.  I see the risk increasing since you&#8217;re now buying stocks on margin.  Sure it might pay off, but then again, we might have a stock market crash and a property market crash.</p>
<p>To quote Kaynes: The market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

