<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MORE S&amp;P 500 Index Stats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/04/06/more-sp-500-index-stats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/04/06/more-sp-500-index-stats/</link>
	<description>A personal finance blog dedicated to discussing such topics as budgeting, asset allocation, 401K, IRA, cash flow, insurance, financial planning, portfolio management, and other areas in personal finance.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:56:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/04/06/more-sp-500-index-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-438960</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1696#comment-438960</guid>
		<description>thanks for putting together all the statistics on the S+P 500. Clearly the inflation adjustment matters, and clearly the average annual return brings the nominal yield down even lower. Going forward the returns might be even lower because of a decrease in yields (comment by Lorax). What happens if you do the math and include 1)the costs of being in a mutual fund and 2)the taxes that you will have to pay when you actually try to get the money out of your 401 or IRA? this will bring the average annual return much lower, won&#039;t it? thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for putting together all the statistics on the S+P 500. Clearly the inflation adjustment matters, and clearly the average annual return brings the nominal yield down even lower. Going forward the returns might be even lower because of a decrease in yields (comment by Lorax). What happens if you do the math and include 1)the costs of being in a mutual fund and 2)the taxes that you will have to pay when you actually try to get the money out of your 401 or IRA? this will bring the average annual return much lower, won&#8217;t it? thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Better than a Savings Bond: Give Stock For Christmas! &#187; Money Forge &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/04/06/more-sp-500-index-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-185147</link>
		<dc:creator>Better than a Savings Bond: Give Stock For Christmas! &#187; Money Forge &#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 21:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1696#comment-185147</guid>
		<description>[...] Greater growth potential. Since 1926, the average total return for the S&amp;P 500 in a 20 year period (the time it takes a bond to mature) is almost 406%, compared to 100% for a savings bond. (Source) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Greater growth potential. Since 1926, the average total return for the S&amp;P 500 in a 20 year period (the time it takes a bond to mature) is almost 406%, compared to 100% for a savings bond. (Source) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The best blog posts &#187; Blog Archive &#187; S&#38;P 500 Index Stats: How would your money have done in an index fund</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/04/06/more-sp-500-index-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-138139</link>
		<dc:creator>The best blog posts &#187; Blog Archive &#187; S&#38;P 500 Index Stats: How would your money have done in an index fund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 19:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1696#comment-138139</guid>
		<description>[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adistantsoil.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Investing Matters</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/04/06/more-sp-500-index-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-95981</link>
		<dc:creator>adistantsoil.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Investing Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 15:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1696#comment-95981</guid>
		<description>[...] Some people are afraid of the stock market. We hear sad stories of people who have lost everything in bad deals. Investing in individual stocks is risky. Putting all your money in one place is just plain silly. That&#8217;s why mutual funds are a pretty safe investment, and the history of the stock market , even over the course of the depression, shows that the market pays. Here&#8217;s  a chart from All Financial Matters. Check out their site for more earnings and investment charts that illustrate how various areas of the stock market have risen and fallen over the years. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some people are afraid of the stock market. We hear sad stories of people who have lost everything in bad deals. Investing in individual stocks is risky. Putting all your money in one place is just plain silly. That&#8217;s why mutual funds are a pretty safe investment, and the history of the stock market , even over the course of the depression, shows that the market pays. Here&#8217;s  a chart from All Financial Matters. Check out their site for more earnings and investment charts that illustrate how various areas of the stock market have risen and fallen over the years. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Personal Finance and Investing Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weekly Blog Roundup, Easter Edition</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/04/06/more-sp-500-index-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-95510</link>
		<dc:creator>Personal Finance and Investing Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weekly Blog Roundup, Easter Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 19:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1696#comment-95510</guid>
		<description>[...] AllFinancialMatters shares some more statistics from S&amp;P 500 returns. The best five year period for the S&amp;P so far has been 1995 to 1999 with a 219.61% total return! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AllFinancialMatters shares some more statistics from S&#38;P 500 returns. The best five year period for the S&#38;P so far has been 1995 to 1999 with a 219.61% total return! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Weekly Blog Roundup, Easter Edition on Consumerism Commentary: A Personal Finance Blog</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/04/06/more-sp-500-index-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-95506</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Weekly Blog Roundup, Easter Edition on Consumerism Commentary: A Personal Finance Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 18:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1696#comment-95506</guid>
		<description>[...] AllFinancialMatters shares some more statistics from S&amp;P 500 returns. The best five year period for the S&amp;P so far has been 1995 to 1999 with a 219.61% total return! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AllFinancialMatters shares some more statistics from S&#38;P 500 returns. The best five year period for the S&#38;P so far has been 1995 to 1999 with a 219.61% total return! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLP</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/04/06/more-sp-500-index-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-95494</link>
		<dc:creator>JLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 15:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1696#comment-95494</guid>
		<description>Steve K,

The difference between the two numbers is that 9.22% is the average inflation-adjusted return, while 7.18% is the average ANNUAL inflation-adjusted return.  In other words, 7.18% is the geometric average.

Make sense?  If not, let me know and I&#039;ll write a post about the difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve K,</p>
<p>The difference between the two numbers is that 9.22% is the average inflation-adjusted return, while 7.18% is the average ANNUAL inflation-adjusted return.  In other words, 7.18% is the geometric average.</p>
<p>Make sense?  If not, let me know and I&#8217;ll write a post about the difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveK</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/04/06/more-sp-500-index-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-95492</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 14:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1696#comment-95492</guid>
		<description>Good stuff!  

Why wouldn&#039;t the Average Real Return Since 1926 (=9.22%) be the same as the Average Annual Real Return since 1926 (=7.18%)?  Can you explain why they are different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff!  </p>
<p>Why wouldn&#8217;t the Average Real Return Since 1926 (=9.22%) be the same as the Average Annual Real Return since 1926 (=7.18%)?  Can you explain why they are different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-04-08 ∞ Get Rich Slowly</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/04/06/more-sp-500-index-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-95466</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-04-08 ∞ Get Rich Slowly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 08:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1696#comment-95466</guid>
		<description>[...] AllFinancialMatters » Blog Archive » MORE S&amp;P 500 Index Stats JLP provides some tables that demonstrate the long-term value of stocks. They also show that stocks don&#8217;t *always* provide stellar returns. (tags: investing investments) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AllFinancialMatters » Blog Archive » MORE S&#38;P 500 Index Stats JLP provides some tables that demonstrate the long-term value of stocks. They also show that stocks don&#8217;t *always* provide stellar returns. (tags: investing investments) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AllFinancialMatters &#187; Blog Archive &#187; S&#38;P 500 Fun Facts</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/04/06/more-sp-500-index-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-95440</link>
		<dc:creator>AllFinancialMatters &#187; Blog Archive &#187; S&#38;P 500 Fun Facts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 22:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=1696#comment-95440</guid>
		<description>[...] FOLLOW-UP: More S&amp;P 500 Stats  Bookmark to:      &#160; [link] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FOLLOW-UP: More S&#38;P 500 Stats  Bookmark to:      &nbsp; [link] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
