<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Preview of the 2008 Federal Income Tax Brackets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/09/26/a-preview-of-the-2008-federal-income-tax-brackets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/09/26/a-preview-of-the-2008-federal-income-tax-brackets/</link>
	<description>A personal finance blog dedicated to discussing such topics as budgeting, asset allocation, 401K, IRA, cash flow, insurance, financial planning, portfolio management, and other areas in personal finance.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:56:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/09/26/a-preview-of-the-2008-federal-income-tax-brackets/comment-page-1/#comment-409112</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=2044#comment-409112</guid>
		<description>Is this total? What i mean is I&#039;m a W2 employee so I pay half my taxes the company i work for pays half. If I decide to go into business for myself I&#039;m responsible for the entire payment. Are these percentages the whole 100% so if I was in the 25% bracket, do I actually pay 12.5% and my employer pays 12.5%?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this total? What i mean is I&#8217;m a W2 employee so I pay half my taxes the company i work for pays half. If I decide to go into business for myself I&#8217;m responsible for the entire payment. Are these percentages the whole 100% so if I was in the 25% bracket, do I actually pay 12.5% and my employer pays 12.5%?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Football, Basketball, Hockey, NASCAR &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Comment on a Preview of the 2008 Federal Income Tax Brackets By &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/09/26/a-preview-of-the-2008-federal-income-tax-brackets/comment-page-1/#comment-398957</link>
		<dc:creator>Football, Basketball, Hockey, NASCAR &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Comment on a Preview of the 2008 Federal Income Tax Brackets By &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=2044#comment-398957</guid>
		<description>[...] mean that Geithner withdrew $20000, and paid about $7000 in federal and state taxes (assuming federal rates of 28% or 33% plus roughly 5% for Maryland). If he had paid all of his taxes and the penalty on time, Geither [...][Continue Reading] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mean that Geithner withdrew $20000, and paid about $7000 in federal and state taxes (assuming federal rates of 28% or 33% plus roughly 5% for Maryland). If he had paid all of his taxes and the penalty on time, Geither [...][Continue Reading] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geithner’s Tax Troubles: There’s Much More, and the Press Is Virtually Ignoring It &#124; Business Opportuinty Buzz And Web News</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/09/26/a-preview-of-the-2008-federal-income-tax-brackets/comment-page-1/#comment-398526</link>
		<dc:creator>Geithner’s Tax Troubles: There’s Much More, and the Press Is Virtually Ignoring It &#124; Business Opportuinty Buzz And Web News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=2044#comment-398526</guid>
		<description>[...] mean that Geithner withdrew $20,000, and paid about $7,000 in federal and state taxes (assuming federal rates of 28% or 33% plus roughly 5% for Maryland). If he had paid all of his taxes and the penalty on time, Geither [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mean that Geithner withdrew $20,000, and paid about $7,000 in federal and state taxes (assuming federal rates of 28% or 33% plus roughly 5% for Maryland). If he had paid all of his taxes and the penalty on time, Geither [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geithner’s Tax Troubles: There’s Much More, and the Press Is Virtually Ignoring It &#124; Got Access News</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/09/26/a-preview-of-the-2008-federal-income-tax-brackets/comment-page-1/#comment-398474</link>
		<dc:creator>Geithner’s Tax Troubles: There’s Much More, and the Press Is Virtually Ignoring It &#124; Got Access News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=2044#comment-398474</guid>
		<description>[...] mean that Geithner withdrew $20,000, and paid about $7,000 in federal and state taxes (assuming federal rates of 28% or 33% plus roughly 5% for Maryland). If he had paid all of his taxes and the penalty on time, Geither [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mean that Geithner withdrew $20,000, and paid about $7,000 in federal and state taxes (assuming federal rates of 28% or 33% plus roughly 5% for Maryland). If he had paid all of his taxes and the penalty on time, Geither [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geithner’s Tax Troubles: There’s Much More, and the Press Is Virtually Ignoring It &#124; Latest Technology News - Business News And Expert Advice</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/09/26/a-preview-of-the-2008-federal-income-tax-brackets/comment-page-1/#comment-398466</link>
		<dc:creator>Geithner’s Tax Troubles: There’s Much More, and the Press Is Virtually Ignoring It &#124; Latest Technology News - Business News And Expert Advice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 06:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=2044#comment-398466</guid>
		<description>[...] mean that Geithner withdrew $20,000, and paid about $7,000 in federal and state taxes (assuming federal rates of 28% or 33% plus roughly 5% for Maryland). If he had paid all of his taxes and the penalty on time, Geither [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mean that Geithner withdrew $20,000, and paid about $7,000 in federal and state taxes (assuming federal rates of 28% or 33% plus roughly 5% for Maryland). If he had paid all of his taxes and the penalty on time, Geither [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geithner’s Tax Troubles: There’s Much More, and the Press Is Virtually Ignoring It</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/09/26/a-preview-of-the-2008-federal-income-tax-brackets/comment-page-1/#comment-398465</link>
		<dc:creator>Geithner’s Tax Troubles: There’s Much More, and the Press Is Virtually Ignoring It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 06:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=2044#comment-398465</guid>
		<description>[...] mean that Geithner withdrew $20,000, and paid about $7,000 in federal and state taxes (assuming federal rates of 28% or 33% plus roughly 5% for Maryland). If he had paid all of his taxes and the penalty on time, Geither [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mean that Geithner withdrew $20,000, and paid about $7,000 in federal and state taxes (assuming federal rates of 28% or 33% plus roughly 5% for Maryland). If he had paid all of his taxes and the penalty on time, Geither [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BizzyBlog &#187; Geithner&#8217;s Tax Troubles: There&#8217;s Much More, and the Press Is Virtually Ignoring It</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/09/26/a-preview-of-the-2008-federal-income-tax-brackets/comment-page-1/#comment-398456</link>
		<dc:creator>BizzyBlog &#187; Geithner&#8217;s Tax Troubles: There&#8217;s Much More, and the Press Is Virtually Ignoring It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 06:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=2044#comment-398456</guid>
		<description>[...] mean that Geithner withdrew $20,000, and paid about $7,000 in federal and state taxes (assuming federal rates of 28% or 33% plus roughly 5% for Maryland). If he had paid all of his taxes and the penalty on time, Geither [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mean that Geithner withdrew $20,000, and paid about $7,000 in federal and state taxes (assuming federal rates of 28% or 33% plus roughly 5% for Maryland). If he had paid all of his taxes and the penalty on time, Geither [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recent URLs tagged Incometax - Urlrecorder</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/09/26/a-preview-of-the-2008-federal-income-tax-brackets/comment-page-1/#comment-394489</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent URLs tagged Incometax - Urlrecorder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 11:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=2044#comment-394489</guid>
		<description>[...] Recent public urls tagged &quot;incometax&quot;  &#8594; Comment on A Preview of the 2008 Federal Income Tax Brackets by Karen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Recent public urls tagged &#8220;incometax&#8221;  &rarr; Comment on A Preview of the 2008 Federal Income Tax Brackets by Karen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/09/26/a-preview-of-the-2008-federal-income-tax-brackets/comment-page-1/#comment-380521</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=2044#comment-380521</guid>
		<description>Nick, 

If you think that a man gains financially by getting married........I just don&#039;t know what to say :)

But you&#039;ve obviously never been married.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, </p>
<p>If you think that a man gains financially by getting married&#8230;&#8230;..I just don&#8217;t know what to say <img src='http://allfinancialmatters.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But you&#8217;ve obviously never been married.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/09/26/a-preview-of-the-2008-federal-income-tax-brackets/comment-page-1/#comment-379791</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=2044#comment-379791</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m looking at earning 34,000 for my first full time job. Looking at these brackets, makes me realize why so many people end up marrying. Besides the majority of people who claim love, I have to think there are some people who are enticed by a different incentive. The differences in tax brackets for single and married are HUGE(especially when counted twice for partners). The 32,000-78,000 single bracket is 25% while the 16,000-65,000 married bracket is only 15%. If I&#039;m not mistaken, having two incomes would be easier to live off of than one, so, honestly, why is there such a huge incentive? I know the defense is &quot;well they probably have kids,&quot; but not every married couple has children, and I think(not sure) there are other benefits on top of the married benefit for having dependents. I&#039;m not saying people don&#039;t marry for love, I&#039;m just upset that there is such a large difference. Am I the only one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m looking at earning 34,000 for my first full time job. Looking at these brackets, makes me realize why so many people end up marrying. Besides the majority of people who claim love, I have to think there are some people who are enticed by a different incentive. The differences in tax brackets for single and married are HUGE(especially when counted twice for partners). The 32,000-78,000 single bracket is 25% while the 16,000-65,000 married bracket is only 15%. If I&#8217;m not mistaken, having two incomes would be easier to live off of than one, so, honestly, why is there such a huge incentive? I know the defense is &#8220;well they probably have kids,&#8221; but not every married couple has children, and I think(not sure) there are other benefits on top of the married benefit for having dependents. I&#8217;m not saying people don&#8217;t marry for love, I&#8217;m just upset that there is such a large difference. Am I the only one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
