<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Full Feeds = Fewer Comments?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/12/04/full-feeds-fewer-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/12/04/full-feeds-fewer-comments/</link>
	<description>A personal finance blog dedicated to discussing such topics as budgeting, asset allocation, 401K, IRA, cash flow, insurance, financial planning, portfolio management, and other areas in personal finance.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:32:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLP</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/12/04/full-feeds-fewer-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-184326</link>
		<dc:creator>JLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 05:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/12/04/full-feeds-less-comments/#comment-184326</guid>
		<description>lorax,

Are you joking?

I&#039;m not thinking about switching back to partial feeds.  I was just making an observation that it seemed like the level of comments dropped off after I switched to full feeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lorax,</p>
<p>Are you joking?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not thinking about switching back to partial feeds.  I was just making an observation that it seemed like the level of comments dropped off after I switched to full feeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLP</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/12/04/full-feeds-fewer-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-184325</link>
		<dc:creator>JLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 05:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/12/04/full-feeds-less-comments/#comment-184325</guid>
		<description>Zen,

By &quot;comments&quot; I meant thoughtful contributions to the discussion.  I think that&#039;s what makes a blog work.  I can&#039;t tell you how many times I have read a comment to one of my posts and thought, &quot;Wow!  I never thought about it like that before.&quot;

I may be the one writing the blog, but I&#039;m also learning a lot from my readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zen,</p>
<p>By &#8220;comments&#8221; I meant thoughtful contributions to the discussion.  I think that&#8217;s what makes a blog work.  I can&#8217;t tell you how many times I have read a comment to one of my posts and thought, &#8220;Wow!  I never thought about it like that before.&#8221;</p>
<p>I may be the one writing the blog, but I&#8217;m also learning a lot from my readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zen</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/12/04/full-feeds-fewer-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-184318</link>
		<dc:creator>Zen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 04:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/12/04/full-feeds-less-comments/#comment-184318</guid>
		<description>Partial feeds get partial attention. You have to write a strong opening to get enough interest to encourage the click through. Otherwise, you could write a strong intro, but aggravate people to see poor content.

Likewise, a full feed needs to encourage discussion. If it&#039;s only going to get &quot;good read&quot; &quot;good article&quot; &quot;cool&quot; or similar comments, then is the &quot;extra&quot; commenting worth it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Partial feeds get partial attention. You have to write a strong opening to get enough interest to encourage the click through. Otherwise, you could write a strong intro, but aggravate people to see poor content.</p>
<p>Likewise, a full feed needs to encourage discussion. If it&#8217;s only going to get &#8220;good read&#8221; &#8220;good article&#8221; &#8220;cool&#8221; or similar comments, then is the &#8220;extra&#8221; commenting worth it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lorax</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/12/04/full-feeds-fewer-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-184267</link>
		<dc:creator>lorax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 02:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/12/04/full-feeds-less-comments/#comment-184267</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d strongly suggest only a partial feed, especially if you want comments, and more ad impressions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d strongly suggest only a partial feed, especially if you want comments, and more ad impressions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fivecentnickel.com</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/12/04/full-feeds-fewer-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-184188</link>
		<dc:creator>fivecentnickel.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/12/04/full-feeds-less-comments/#comment-184188</guid>
		<description>Feedburner allows you to include the comment count at the end of each article in your feed. Not sure if you use that, but it could help interaction a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feedburner allows you to include the comment count at the end of each article in your feed. Not sure if you use that, but it could help interaction a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLP</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/12/04/full-feeds-fewer-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-184116</link>
		<dc:creator>JLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/12/04/full-feeds-less-comments/#comment-184116</guid>
		<description>r,

Well, I couldn&#039;t let an error like  that coexist on a blog of perfection.  LOL!

My biggest pet peeve is when people use &quot;then&quot; in place of &quot;than.&quot;  I&#039;m sure they do it because they spell it the way they say it or hear it but it still gets on my nerves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>r,</p>
<p>Well, I couldn&#8217;t let an error like  that coexist on a blog of perfection.  LOL!</p>
<p>My biggest pet peeve is when people use &#8220;then&#8221; in place of &#8220;than.&#8221;  I&#8217;m sure they do it because they spell it the way they say it or hear it but it still gets on my nerves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/12/04/full-feeds-fewer-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-184112</link>
		<dc:creator>r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/12/04/full-feeds-less-comments/#comment-184112</guid>
		<description>Awww, it&#039;s surprisingly comforting to see it changed!  Thanks!

No worries on mixing them up - it was one of my father&#039;s pet peeves when I was growing up, so at this point it just sounds wrong to me when they&#039;re backwards.  But there are plenty of other things that bother other people that I mix up all the time (who vs whom, for example...).  And that versus which.  I&#039;m trying to work on that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awww, it&#8217;s surprisingly comforting to see it changed!  Thanks!</p>
<p>No worries on mixing them up &#8211; it was one of my father&#8217;s pet peeves when I was growing up, so at this point it just sounds wrong to me when they&#8217;re backwards.  But there are plenty of other things that bother other people that I mix up all the time (who vs whom, for example&#8230;).  And that versus which.  I&#8217;m trying to work on that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLP</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/12/04/full-feeds-fewer-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-184071</link>
		<dc:creator>JLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/12/04/full-feeds-less-comments/#comment-184071</guid>
		<description>r,

Geez,... For some reason I can&#039;t keep &quot;fewer&quot; and &quot;less&quot; straight!  I&#039;ll do better from now on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>r,</p>
<p>Geez,&#8230; For some reason I can&#8217;t keep &#8220;fewer&#8221; and &#8220;less&#8221; straight!  I&#8217;ll do better from now on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crazypumpkin</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/12/04/full-feeds-fewer-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-184068</link>
		<dc:creator>crazypumpkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/12/04/full-feeds-less-comments/#comment-184068</guid>
		<description>Like Mrs. Micah said, if the very beginning of a partial feed doesn&#039;t interest me, I&#039;m much less likely to click through to read the rest of it.  But with a full feed, I&#039;m more likely to at least skim it.
But I also feel like you haven&#039;t been posting as much lately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Mrs. Micah said, if the very beginning of a partial feed doesn&#8217;t interest me, I&#8217;m much less likely to click through to read the rest of it.  But with a full feed, I&#8217;m more likely to at least skim it.<br />
But I also feel like you haven&#8217;t been posting as much lately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs. Micah</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/12/04/full-feeds-fewer-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-184059</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs. Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/2007/12/04/full-feeds-less-comments/#comment-184059</guid>
		<description>I prefer full feeds because I can figure out if I have something to contribute. Beware partials--if the first part doesn&#039;t look interesting, I&#039;ll move on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer full feeds because I can figure out if I have something to contribute. Beware partials&#8211;if the first part doesn&#8217;t look interesting, I&#8217;ll move on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

