<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Guy Sounds Exactly Like Me!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allfinancialmatters.com/2008/10/06/this-guy-sounds-exactly-like-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2008/10/06/this-guy-sounds-exactly-like-me/</link>
	<description>A personal finance blog dedicated to discussing such topics as budgeting, asset allocation, 401K, IRA, cash flow, insurance, financial planning, portfolio management, and other areas in personal finance.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:52:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khyron</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2008/10/06/this-guy-sounds-exactly-like-me/comment-page-1/#comment-368872</link>
		<dc:creator>Khyron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=2857#comment-368872</guid>
		<description>EZ: 

Ahem. http://bit.ly/3QFeJd and http://bit.ly/1Myj3D

Christine and Karim:

Do you even understand what a credit default swap is? Blaming a product without having an inkling of what it is or what it does is inane.

Start here. Don&#039;t worry, I&#039;ll wait. http://bit.ly/3QuOgi

Now that you&#039;re done with that, no leveraging? Even a traditional 30 year fixed mortgage at a good rate is LEVERAGE by the very definition. Most people could not EVER buy a house without the leverage of a mortgage. Be careful what you wish for.

At the end of the day, everyone here is right. Add up everything you all said and you have your answer. I don&#039;t get this political posturing and pandering (like EZ, or maybe its racial), but all of this is correct. EVERYONE is responsible for this current situation. Companies, consumers, government (remember: you get the politicians you deserve), lenders, investment banks, mortgage brokers, NRSROs, and everyone else in between.

Remember the tagline from the movie &quot;Traffic&quot;? &quot;No one gets away clean.&quot;

Get over yourselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EZ: </p>
<p>Ahem. <a href="http://bit.ly/3QFeJd" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3QFeJd</a> and <a href="http://bit.ly/1Myj3D" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1Myj3D</a></p>
<p>Christine and Karim:</p>
<p>Do you even understand what a credit default swap is? Blaming a product without having an inkling of what it is or what it does is inane.</p>
<p>Start here. Don&#8217;t worry, I&#8217;ll wait. <a href="http://bit.ly/3QuOgi" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3QuOgi</a></p>
<p>Now that you&#8217;re done with that, no leveraging? Even a traditional 30 year fixed mortgage at a good rate is LEVERAGE by the very definition. Most people could not EVER buy a house without the leverage of a mortgage. Be careful what you wish for.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, everyone here is right. Add up everything you all said and you have your answer. I don&#8217;t get this political posturing and pandering (like EZ, or maybe its racial), but all of this is correct. EVERYONE is responsible for this current situation. Companies, consumers, government (remember: you get the politicians you deserve), lenders, investment banks, mortgage brokers, NRSROs, and everyone else in between.</p>
<p>Remember the tagline from the movie &#8220;Traffic&#8221;? &#8220;No one gets away clean.&#8221;</p>
<p>Get over yourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon C</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2008/10/06/this-guy-sounds-exactly-like-me/comment-page-1/#comment-367886</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=2857#comment-367886</guid>
		<description>Thanks for writing this. It&#039;s-not-my-faultism is running rampant at the moment. Any bail out is just going to worsen the foreclosure problem. We already have people walking away because they are upside down, lets not give others the reason to default so that the government will modify their loan to save them money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for writing this. It&#8217;s-not-my-faultism is running rampant at the moment. Any bail out is just going to worsen the foreclosure problem. We already have people walking away because they are upside down, lets not give others the reason to default so that the government will modify their loan to save them money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slinky</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2008/10/06/this-guy-sounds-exactly-like-me/comment-page-1/#comment-367603</link>
		<dc:creator>Slinky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=2857#comment-367603</guid>
		<description>The problem here is that some things don&#039;t work halfway. You deregulate and let people do what they want. Great. People do stupid things and the companies start to go under. Then the government bails them out. Of course that doesn&#039;t work! If you let people have free reign, you also have to give them free reign to fail. The greedy will eventually fail and better companies will take their places.

If people can do whatever stupid, greedy thing they want and know that the government will bail them out, they WILL keep doing it. If they know they can fail, they are more likely to stick to a more sound, sustainable business plan. Or the company will fall and others less stupid will take over their market share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem here is that some things don&#8217;t work halfway. You deregulate and let people do what they want. Great. People do stupid things and the companies start to go under. Then the government bails them out. Of course that doesn&#8217;t work! If you let people have free reign, you also have to give them free reign to fail. The greedy will eventually fail and better companies will take their places.</p>
<p>If people can do whatever stupid, greedy thing they want and know that the government will bail them out, they WILL keep doing it. If they know they can fail, they are more likely to stick to a more sound, sustainable business plan. Or the company will fall and others less stupid will take over their market share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2008/10/06/this-guy-sounds-exactly-like-me/comment-page-1/#comment-367424</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=2857#comment-367424</guid>
		<description>JLP: a little backwords: Wallstreet created supply, consumers created the demand.

I agree though.  I&#039;m glad more (albeit at a trickle) opeds, articles, and opinions are surfacing placing blame and control at the consumer level.  Thus far we have been very wanting of personal responsibility, because it is far easier to blame others for something we had full control over.  Yes, many other things happened too, but we as consumers had a great deal of control over our spending behavior.

oh, and everyone really needs to stop trashing credit cards and debit cards, because i have huge positions in visa.  swipe, swipe away (on visa of course), just do it responsibly and within your means...on VISA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JLP: a little backwords: Wallstreet created supply, consumers created the demand.</p>
<p>I agree though.  I&#8217;m glad more (albeit at a trickle) opeds, articles, and opinions are surfacing placing blame and control at the consumer level.  Thus far we have been very wanting of personal responsibility, because it is far easier to blame others for something we had full control over.  Yes, many other things happened too, but we as consumers had a great deal of control over our spending behavior.</p>
<p>oh, and everyone really needs to stop trashing credit cards and debit cards, because i have huge positions in visa.  swipe, swipe away (on visa of course), just do it responsibly and within your means&#8230;on VISA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2008/10/06/this-guy-sounds-exactly-like-me/comment-page-1/#comment-367332</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=2857#comment-367332</guid>
		<description>I think the problem runs a little deeper than this. It is easy to point the finger at the lender or the government, but what it all comes down to is lack of financial education and commercial programming. 

You look at the people who lived during the Not-So-Great Depression and you see people who learned to practice extreme savings. But as their kids grew up they were exposed to all the radio, TV and print ads telling them all the great stuff they could have. The only problem is that they didn&#039;t have the money for all this stuff they were told was theirs for the taking.

Then along come the credit card companies to show them that they can have it right now! Instant gratification runs rampant and they get themselves into debt for things they really don&#039;t need to survive. Then they have kids and pass their bad financial skills on to them and so on and so forth. We should change the national motto from &quot;The Land of Opportunity&quot; by adding a subline that says &quot;Where You Will Receive 3-5 Opportunities to Get Deeper In Debt EVERY DAY!&quot;

Now we have Check Cards or Debit Cards that look like credit cards. You may still be paying cash instead of incurring a debt with your purchase, but what do you think kids are learning when they see their parents use the card - swipe the plastic card and you get things! It reinforces that instant gratification mentality because nobody explains to them the importance of saving and living within their means.

So all this has compounded to where adult &quot;children&quot; are exposed to an opportunity to get into a brand new home with the latest in gadgetry and style. Do you really think they are going to consider too deeply how they are going to pay it off? Why? They haven&#039;t so far. And those that do think about it are exposed to new and exciting terms like ARMs and the promise of the lenders that the rates will stay low, if not go lower. They did&#039;t have the financial education to realize what a crock that was and signed on the dotted line.

We need to get back to practicing and teaching sound financial principles like earning the money you spend before you actually spend it and saving up for the things you buy. We need to get back to making the phrase &quot;The Land of Opportunity&quot; mean the opportunity to earn not the opportunity to spend. And we need to get away from government band-aid fixes that don&#039;t have a chance of working and don&#039;t really deal with the root of the problem.

What difference do you think it would make in terms of the impressions our children receive if the majority of the people in the U.S. went back to using cash instead of Check Cards? That may be a little bit inconvenient, but so is footing the bill for a $700 billion bail out package.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the problem runs a little deeper than this. It is easy to point the finger at the lender or the government, but what it all comes down to is lack of financial education and commercial programming. </p>
<p>You look at the people who lived during the Not-So-Great Depression and you see people who learned to practice extreme savings. But as their kids grew up they were exposed to all the radio, TV and print ads telling them all the great stuff they could have. The only problem is that they didn&#8217;t have the money for all this stuff they were told was theirs for the taking.</p>
<p>Then along come the credit card companies to show them that they can have it right now! Instant gratification runs rampant and they get themselves into debt for things they really don&#8217;t need to survive. Then they have kids and pass their bad financial skills on to them and so on and so forth. We should change the national motto from &#8220;The Land of Opportunity&#8221; by adding a subline that says &#8220;Where You Will Receive 3-5 Opportunities to Get Deeper In Debt EVERY DAY!&#8221;</p>
<p>Now we have Check Cards or Debit Cards that look like credit cards. You may still be paying cash instead of incurring a debt with your purchase, but what do you think kids are learning when they see their parents use the card &#8211; swipe the plastic card and you get things! It reinforces that instant gratification mentality because nobody explains to them the importance of saving and living within their means.</p>
<p>So all this has compounded to where adult &#8220;children&#8221; are exposed to an opportunity to get into a brand new home with the latest in gadgetry and style. Do you really think they are going to consider too deeply how they are going to pay it off? Why? They haven&#8217;t so far. And those that do think about it are exposed to new and exciting terms like ARMs and the promise of the lenders that the rates will stay low, if not go lower. They did&#8217;t have the financial education to realize what a crock that was and signed on the dotted line.</p>
<p>We need to get back to practicing and teaching sound financial principles like earning the money you spend before you actually spend it and saving up for the things you buy. We need to get back to making the phrase &#8220;The Land of Opportunity&#8221; mean the opportunity to earn not the opportunity to spend. And we need to get away from government band-aid fixes that don&#8217;t have a chance of working and don&#8217;t really deal with the root of the problem.</p>
<p>What difference do you think it would make in terms of the impressions our children receive if the majority of the people in the U.S. went back to using cash instead of Check Cards? That may be a little bit inconvenient, but so is footing the bill for a $700 billion bail out package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary@SimplyForties</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2008/10/06/this-guy-sounds-exactly-like-me/comment-page-1/#comment-367329</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary@SimplyForties</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=2857#comment-367329</guid>
		<description>The worse part about labeling yourself as a victim is that it leads you to believe you can&#039;t help yourself out of your bad situation.  If someone suffered a real change in circumstances after taking on an affordable mortgage, that&#039;s understandable.  If they bought something they couldn&#039;t afford in the first place, that&#039;s something else entirely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The worse part about labeling yourself as a victim is that it leads you to believe you can&#8217;t help yourself out of your bad situation.  If someone suffered a real change in circumstances after taking on an affordable mortgage, that&#8217;s understandable.  If they bought something they couldn&#8217;t afford in the first place, that&#8217;s something else entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimmyDaGeek</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2008/10/06/this-guy-sounds-exactly-like-me/comment-page-1/#comment-367307</link>
		<dc:creator>JimmyDaGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=2857#comment-367307</guid>
		<description>Liberals are adept at creating labels to hide the problem they don&#039;t want to admit exists. People who lied on their mortgage applications to get houses they couldn&#039;t afford are victims. People opposing illegal aliens are anti-immigrant, and child poverty advocates never blame the irresponsible adult children that have kids they don&#039;t want and can&#039;t afford.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberals are adept at creating labels to hide the problem they don&#8217;t want to admit exists. People who lied on their mortgage applications to get houses they couldn&#8217;t afford are victims. People opposing illegal aliens are anti-immigrant, and child poverty advocates never blame the irresponsible adult children that have kids they don&#8217;t want and can&#8217;t afford.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EZ</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2008/10/06/this-guy-sounds-exactly-like-me/comment-page-1/#comment-367266</link>
		<dc:creator>EZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=2857#comment-367266</guid>
		<description>I think some of your readers are a bit confused by blaming everything on business.  Congress and Jimmy Carter enacted the CRA or Community Reinvestment Act, and modified it later to ALLOW lower income people to purchase a home. The democrats wanted everyone who wanted a home to buy one, regardless of whether they could afford it.  Then Fannie and Freddie jumped on the bandwagon, while these government sponsored programs spent money on lobbyists who catered to the democrats.  Of course business got greedy, but congress fed that greed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think some of your readers are a bit confused by blaming everything on business.  Congress and Jimmy Carter enacted the CRA or Community Reinvestment Act, and modified it later to ALLOW lower income people to purchase a home. The democrats wanted everyone who wanted a home to buy one, regardless of whether they could afford it.  Then Fannie and Freddie jumped on the bandwagon, while these government sponsored programs spent money on lobbyists who catered to the democrats.  Of course business got greedy, but congress fed that greed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karim</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2008/10/06/this-guy-sounds-exactly-like-me/comment-page-1/#comment-367095</link>
		<dc:creator>Karim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 03:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=2857#comment-367095</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Christine. The majority of the blame should fall squarely on the financial companies that were taking these risky loans and putting them into the credit default swap system. 

It all started out with predatory lending practices too. Many of these homeowners with sub prime mortgages were eligible for prime rate mortgages (source below). When applying for the mortgages, the banks presented the sub prime mortgage offer often not even informing the customer of their prime rate eligibility. The banks made more money selling mortgages at higher interest rates assuming the customers would be &quot;fine&quot; when the value of their houses were to rise.

The banks got greedy, and to patch up these risky loans that they willingly gave out as sound &#039;insured&#039; investments was what caused this entire market meltdown to begin with where it otherwise could have been avoided.

Source of information on mortgage eligibility:
http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:F_S9MnWz7NsJ:jec.senate.gov/Documents/Releases/12.19.07brookingsspeechrelease.pdf+Charles+Schumer+eligible+subprime+mortgage&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=1&amp;gl=ca&amp;client=firefox-a</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Christine. The majority of the blame should fall squarely on the financial companies that were taking these risky loans and putting them into the credit default swap system. </p>
<p>It all started out with predatory lending practices too. Many of these homeowners with sub prime mortgages were eligible for prime rate mortgages (source below). When applying for the mortgages, the banks presented the sub prime mortgage offer often not even informing the customer of their prime rate eligibility. The banks made more money selling mortgages at higher interest rates assuming the customers would be &#8220;fine&#8221; when the value of their houses were to rise.</p>
<p>The banks got greedy, and to patch up these risky loans that they willingly gave out as sound &#8216;insured&#8217; investments was what caused this entire market meltdown to begin with where it otherwise could have been avoided.</p>
<p>Source of information on mortgage eligibility:<br />
<a href="http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:F_S9MnWz7NsJ:jec.senate.gov/Documents/Releases/12.19.07brookingsspeechrelease.pdf+Charles+Schumer+eligible+subprime+mortgage&#038;hl=en&#038;ct=clnk&#038;cd=1&#038;gl=ca&#038;client=firefox-a" rel="nofollow">http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:F_S9MnWz7NsJ:jec.senate.gov/Documents/Releases/12.19.07brookingsspeechrelease.pdf+Charles+Schumer+eligible+subprime+mortgage&#038;hl=en&#038;ct=clnk&#038;cd=1&#038;gl=ca&#038;client=firefox-a</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tina</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2008/10/06/this-guy-sounds-exactly-like-me/comment-page-1/#comment-367089</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 02:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=2857#comment-367089</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m at the point of thinking that people should be required to take a basic &quot;homebuying 101&quot; class before purchasing a home. Obviously, the lenders can&#039;t be trusted to guide people to sensible purchases, and evidently people can&#039;t be trusted to get unbiased information before making the biggest purchase of their lives. I&#039;m appalled that so many people made such a big move on blind faith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m at the point of thinking that people should be required to take a basic &#8220;homebuying 101&#8243; class before purchasing a home. Obviously, the lenders can&#8217;t be trusted to guide people to sensible purchases, and evidently people can&#8217;t be trusted to get unbiased information before making the biggest purchase of their lives. I&#8217;m appalled that so many people made such a big move on blind faith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

