<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Each Stock Affects the Dow&#8217;s Performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allfinancialmatters.com/2008/10/27/how-each-stock-affects-the-dows-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2008/10/27/how-each-stock-affects-the-dows-performance/</link>
	<description>A personal finance blog dedicated to discussing such topics as budgeting, asset allocation, 401K, IRA, cash flow, insurance, financial planning, portfolio management, and other areas in personal finance.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:52:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerard</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2008/10/27/how-each-stock-affects-the-dows-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-374510</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 02:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=2906#comment-374510</guid>
		<description>Indices (and aggregates in general) are neither good nor bad inherently. As long as you recognise the intent behind them and pay attention to their limitation and the methodology behind their construction, then they tend to do their job... The problem always is that people don&#039;t take the time to pay attention to the details (myself included) and get into trouble as a result...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indices (and aggregates in general) are neither good nor bad inherently. As long as you recognise the intent behind them and pay attention to their limitation and the methodology behind their construction, then they tend to do their job&#8230; The problem always is that people don&#8217;t take the time to pay attention to the details (myself included) and get into trouble as a result&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbk</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2008/10/27/how-each-stock-affects-the-dows-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-374437</link>
		<dc:creator>rbk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=2906#comment-374437</guid>
		<description>Mike--

There may be other reasons but one is that people like to refer to the DJIA when they talk about where the market is moving, and it is not a great measure of that. The DJIA is

1) only 30 stocks-- a small sampling

2) not diversified among sectors

3) made up only of very large companies

Basically between the small sample size and lack of diversification both by size and sector, it&#039;s just not a good index to follow for market trends.

Others may have more input, but for this reason I pay a lot more attention to the S&amp;P 500 for large cap stocks and one of several other indices for whole-market or mid- and small-caps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike&#8211;</p>
<p>There may be other reasons but one is that people like to refer to the DJIA when they talk about where the market is moving, and it is not a great measure of that. The DJIA is</p>
<p>1) only 30 stocks&#8211; a small sampling</p>
<p>2) not diversified among sectors</p>
<p>3) made up only of very large companies</p>
<p>Basically between the small sample size and lack of diversification both by size and sector, it&#8217;s just not a good index to follow for market trends.</p>
<p>Others may have more input, but for this reason I pay a lot more attention to the S&amp;P 500 for large cap stocks and one of several other indices for whole-market or mid- and small-caps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2008/10/27/how-each-stock-affects-the-dows-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-374436</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=2906#comment-374436</guid>
		<description>Cool post.

Can someone explain to me how the Dow is a &#039;bad index&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool post.</p>
<p>Can someone explain to me how the Dow is a &#8216;bad index&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2008/10/27/how-each-stock-affects-the-dows-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-374413</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=2906#comment-374413</guid>
		<description>I definitely agree that the Dow is build on poor math.  However, historical charts of the Dow vs the S&amp;P 500 are almost identical.  So I don&#039;t think it&#039;s really that big a deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely agree that the Dow is build on poor math.  However, historical charts of the Dow vs the S&amp;P 500 are almost identical.  So I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s really that big a deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

