<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Was Right!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allfinancialmatters.com/2009/06/22/i-was-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2009/06/22/i-was-right/</link>
	<description>A personal finance blog dedicated to discussing such topics as budgeting, asset allocation, 401K, IRA, cash flow, insurance, financial planning, portfolio management, and other areas in personal finance.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 20:32:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LOL</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2009/06/22/i-was-right/comment-page-1/#comment-426776</link>
		<dc:creator>LOL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=3564#comment-426776</guid>
		<description>Just to clarify -- when I said to eliminate the 15% dividend tax -- I mean that the dividend payments should be taxed at the normal income tax rates. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to clarify &#8212; when I said to eliminate the 15% dividend tax &#8212; I mean that the dividend payments should be taxed at the normal income tax rates. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LOL</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2009/06/22/i-was-right/comment-page-1/#comment-426775</link>
		<dc:creator>LOL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=3564#comment-426775</guid>
		<description>Alex R: I tend to agree with you on the medical costs -- probably why Obama is on the Health-Insurance for everyone crusade, though I doubt his plan will fix the real problem: 
 
The middle class is under a massive squeeze: they can&#039;t afford medical care, college for kids, housing, etc.  The only reason we have not been in recession since 2000 is due to availability of cheap debt to absorb the rising costs -- while at the same time, having a reduction in wages and offshoring of their jobs. 
 
My crystal ball tells me that we will not have a sustained economic recovery without a middle-class, and the best way to bring the middle-class back is to drastically reduce taxes on them, and increase the taxes on the rich to rates that are at least equal, if not above, the middle-class tax rates. 
 
This means: remove the income cap on Social Security and Medicare taxes, and eliminate the 15% dividend tax.  The rich get the majority of their income through dividends, yet they are taxed at the 15% poverty level. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex R: I tend to agree with you on the medical costs &#8212; probably why Obama is on the Health-Insurance for everyone crusade, though I doubt his plan will fix the real problem: </p>
<p>The middle class is under a massive squeeze: they can&#039;t afford medical care, college for kids, housing, etc.  The only reason we have not been in recession since 2000 is due to availability of cheap debt to absorb the rising costs &#8212; while at the same time, having a reduction in wages and offshoring of their jobs. </p>
<p>My crystal ball tells me that we will not have a sustained economic recovery without a middle-class, and the best way to bring the middle-class back is to drastically reduce taxes on them, and increase the taxes on the rich to rates that are at least equal, if not above, the middle-class tax rates. </p>
<p>This means: remove the income cap on Social Security and Medicare taxes, and eliminate the 15% dividend tax.  The rich get the majority of their income through dividends, yet they are taxed at the 15% poverty level. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2009/06/22/i-was-right/comment-page-1/#comment-426707</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=3564#comment-426707</guid>
		<description>In addition, even if some boileroom monkey was trying to put a borrower in a subprime loan, ONE PHONE CALL to a competing broker would have uncovered it.  The mortgage broker business is a dog eat dog world and there is nothing easier to sell against than when a competitor is trying to shoehorn a prime borrower into a subprime loan.  Any borrower who got put in a subprime loan that truly qualified for a conventional loan or FHA did so because they didnt&#039; take the time to get a second opinion or shop around just even a little bit. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition, even if some boileroom monkey was trying to put a borrower in a subprime loan, ONE PHONE CALL to a competing broker would have uncovered it.  The mortgage broker business is a dog eat dog world and there is nothing easier to sell against than when a competitor is trying to shoehorn a prime borrower into a subprime loan.  Any borrower who got put in a subprime loan that truly qualified for a conventional loan or FHA did so because they didnt&#039; take the time to get a second opinion or shop around just even a little bit. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2009/06/22/i-was-right/comment-page-1/#comment-426706</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=3564#comment-426706</guid>
		<description>Mortgage Broker here... JP, generally subprime did not pay as much as conventional or FHA loans at the loan officer level.   In fact, FHA pays one of the highest commissions (yield spread premiums) for any loan product pound for pound.  The only loan products that generally paid more than FHA is the Option ARM and that was only if you slapped a three year prepay on the loan.   
 
This isn&#039;t to say that some firms weren&#039;t making more on subprime at the company level selling direct to the street, but I assure you, those profits hardly ever made it down to the LOs.  No LO, unless they were working for one of the boilerrooms, would ever have an incentive to put a borrower in a subprime loan over a conventional or FHA.  The only reasons to are the borrower doesn&#039;t qualify or that particular brokerage couldn&#039;t originate FHA loans.   
 
Many of these companies had limited product offerings, so often times their LOs would just hardsell whatever they had.  It wasn&#039;t so much they were trying to make more money.  If all you can offer is a 2/28 subprime loan then that is what you are going to sell, not unlike all businesses. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mortgage Broker here&#8230; JP, generally subprime did not pay as much as conventional or FHA loans at the loan officer level.   In fact, FHA pays one of the highest commissions (yield spread premiums) for any loan product pound for pound.  The only loan products that generally paid more than FHA is the Option ARM and that was only if you slapped a three year prepay on the loan.   </p>
<p>This isn&#039;t to say that some firms weren&#039;t making more on subprime at the company level selling direct to the street, but I assure you, those profits hardly ever made it down to the LOs.  No LO, unless they were working for one of the boilerrooms, would ever have an incentive to put a borrower in a subprime loan over a conventional or FHA.  The only reasons to are the borrower doesn&#039;t qualify or that particular brokerage couldn&#039;t originate FHA loans.   </p>
<p>Many of these companies had limited product offerings, so often times their LOs would just hardsell whatever they had.  It wasn&#039;t so much they were trying to make more money.  If all you can offer is a 2/28 subprime loan then that is what you are going to sell, not unlike all businesses. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerard</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2009/06/22/i-was-right/comment-page-1/#comment-426697</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=3564#comment-426697</guid>
		<description>JLP, for a broader sense of the crisis, I recommend reading this Morningstar article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.morningstar.com/articlenet/article.aspx?id=294825&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://news.morningstar.com/articlenet/article.as...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JLP, for a broader sense of the crisis, I recommend reading this Morningstar article: <a href="http://news.morningstar.com/articlenet/article.aspx?id=294825" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://news.morningstar.com/articlenet/article.as" rel="nofollow">http://news.morningstar.com/articlenet/article.as</a>&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex R.</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2009/06/22/i-was-right/comment-page-1/#comment-426681</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=3564#comment-426681</guid>
		<description>Despite, the subprime mess, another culprit may be at root cause as well: medical expenses. According to a recent study from the American Journal of Medicine, 62.1% of bankruptcies in 2007 were due to health expenses, up 50% of what it was back in 2001 when the same study had been conducted. (Himmelstein, et al, 2009)  
 
75% of these individuals claiming bankruptcy had health insurance and came from well-educated backgrounds where they owned their homes and had middle class jobs (Himmelstein, et al, 2009). 
 
 Some 1.5 million families lose their homes due to medical related expenses each year (NCHC, 2009). 
 
 Health expenses will cost  $8,160 per person paid either directly through health expenses and health insurance premiums or in others ways such through taxes and inflated prices (Associated Press, 2009).  
 
Not saying people aren&#039;t at fault for taking on bad mortgages, they&#039;re the same people at fault for not taking control of their health, who will pay $65 to get their hair done but are suddenly broke when it comes to paying their bills. 
 
References:  
 
Associated Press. (2009). Healthcare costs to top $8000 per person. Retrieved June 22, 2009 from MSNBC Web site &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29355231/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29355231/&lt;/a&gt; 
  
Himmelstein, D. U., Thorne, D., Warren E, Woolhandler S. (2009). Medical bankruptcy in the United States, 2007: results of a national study. Am J Med, XX, XXX. (not yet published) 
 
National Coalition on Health Care (NCHC). (2009). Facts about healthcare costs. Retrieved June 22, 2009 from NCHC Web site &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nchc.org/documents/Cost%20Fact%20Sheet-2009.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.nchc.org/documents/Cost%20Fact%20Sheet...&lt;/a&gt; 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite, the subprime mess, another culprit may be at root cause as well: medical expenses. According to a recent study from the American Journal of Medicine, 62.1% of bankruptcies in 2007 were due to health expenses, up 50% of what it was back in 2001 when the same study had been conducted. (Himmelstein, et al, 2009)  </p>
<p>75% of these individuals claiming bankruptcy had health insurance and came from well-educated backgrounds where they owned their homes and had middle class jobs (Himmelstein, et al, 2009). </p>
<p> Some 1.5 million families lose their homes due to medical related expenses each year (NCHC, 2009). </p>
<p> Health expenses will cost  $8,160 per person paid either directly through health expenses and health insurance premiums or in others ways such through taxes and inflated prices (Associated Press, 2009).  </p>
<p>Not saying people aren&#039;t at fault for taking on bad mortgages, they&#039;re the same people at fault for not taking control of their health, who will pay $65 to get their hair done but are suddenly broke when it comes to paying their bills. </p>
<p>References:  </p>
<p>Associated Press. (2009). Healthcare costs to top $8000 per person. Retrieved June 22, 2009 from MSNBC Web site <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29355231/" target="_blank">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29355231/</a> </p>
<p>Himmelstein, D. U., Thorne, D., Warren E, Woolhandler S. (2009). Medical bankruptcy in the United States, 2007: results of a national study. Am J Med, XX, XXX. (not yet published) </p>
<p>National Coalition on Health Care (NCHC). (2009). Facts about healthcare costs. Retrieved June 22, 2009 from NCHC Web site <a href="http://www.nchc.org/documents/Cost%20Fact%20Sheet-2009.pdf" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.nchc.org/documents/Cost%20Fact%20Sheet" rel="nofollow">http://www.nchc.org/documents/Cost%20Fact%20Sheet</a>&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LOL</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2009/06/22/i-was-right/comment-page-1/#comment-426669</link>
		<dc:creator>LOL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=3564#comment-426669</guid>
		<description>JLP: Have you seen the CNBC documentary called &quot;House of Cards&quot;?  Faber does a great job explaining how the boom and bust of this housing bubble: 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1145392808&amp;play=1&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1145392808&amp;...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JLP: Have you seen the CNBC documentary called &quot;House of Cards&quot;?  Faber does a great job explaining how the boom and bust of this housing bubble: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1145392808&amp;play=1" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1145392808&#038;" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1145392808&#038;</a>&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

