<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Follow Up on My Berkshire Hathaway Post from Two Years Ago</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allfinancialmatters.com/2010/03/11/follow-up-on-my-berkshire-hathaway-post-from-two-years-ago/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2010/03/11/follow-up-on-my-berkshire-hathaway-post-from-two-years-ago/</link>
	<description>A personal finance blog dedicated to discussing such topics as budgeting, asset allocation, 401K, IRA, cash flow, insurance, financial planning, portfolio management, and other areas in personal finance.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:48:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2010/03/11/follow-up-on-my-berkshire-hathaway-post-from-two-years-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-442844</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=4687#comment-442844</guid>
		<description>The better measure of returns would be the rate of return over/under the market average ... The numbers are a bit skewed because the annual rate of return for the last 10 years is about 0% so 5% doesn&#039;t look so bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The better measure of returns would be the rate of return over/under the market average &#8230; The numbers are a bit skewed because the annual rate of return for the last 10 years is about 0% so 5% doesn&#8217;t look so bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BG</title>
		<link>http://allfinancialmatters.com/2010/03/11/follow-up-on-my-berkshire-hathaway-post-from-two-years-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-442808</link>
		<dc:creator>BG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfinancialmatters.com/?p=4687#comment-442808</guid>
		<description>Berkshire has held up so well because the US taxpayer bailed out 30% of their holdings with TARP money: Goldman Sachs, US Bancorp, American Express, Wells Fargo, etc.

Berkshire is the largest shareholder of Wells Fargo, and Wells got 91% of the TARP money for all companies headquartered in California.

&quot;If I didn&#039;t think the government was going to act, I would not be doing anything this week,&quot; Buffett told CNBC after investing $5 billion in Goldman Sachs. &quot;I am, to some extent, betting on the fact that the government will do the rational thing here and act promptly.&quot;

I&#039;m sure Congress would _not_ have passed the bailout if it wasn&#039;t for Buffet&#039;s fear mongering to the public and to Congress.  We were sheep and believed what Buffet was saying -- and guess what, Buffet went to the buffet at the expense of future generations of US taxpayers.

If you want to stop lobbyist influencing policy in Congress -- I suggest you start with Buffet -- the biggest lobbyist of them all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Berkshire has held up so well because the US taxpayer bailed out 30% of their holdings with TARP money: Goldman Sachs, US Bancorp, American Express, Wells Fargo, etc.</p>
<p>Berkshire is the largest shareholder of Wells Fargo, and Wells got 91% of the TARP money for all companies headquartered in California.</p>
<p>&#8220;If I didn&#8217;t think the government was going to act, I would not be doing anything this week,&#8221; Buffett told CNBC after investing $5 billion in Goldman Sachs. &#8220;I am, to some extent, betting on the fact that the government will do the rational thing here and act promptly.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure Congress would _not_ have passed the bailout if it wasn&#8217;t for Buffet&#8217;s fear mongering to the public and to Congress.  We were sheep and believed what Buffet was saying &#8212; and guess what, Buffet went to the buffet at the expense of future generations of US taxpayers.</p>
<p>If you want to stop lobbyist influencing policy in Congress &#8212; I suggest you start with Buffet &#8212; the biggest lobbyist of them all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

