Search


Subscribe to AFM


Subscribe to AllFinancialMatters
by Email

All Financial Matters

Promote Your Page Too

The American's Creed

Site Sponsors

Books I Recommend


AFM in the Media


Money Magazine May 2008

Real Simple March 2008

Blogroll (Daily Reads)

« | Main | »

25 Years Ago Today…

By JLP | January 28, 2011

President Reagan’s remarks—one of his most poignant speeches, in my opinion. It still makes me tear up.

I remember that day. I just happened to be sitting in a science class when the explosion happened. Our science teacher had a TV brought into the room. The room was silent. I remember having a pit in my stomach.

Topics: Miscellaneous | 4 Comments »


4 Responses to “25 Years Ago Today…”

  1. Todd Hickman Says:
    January 28th, 2011 at 9:51 am

    Thursday, July 28, 2005 9:27 a.m. EDT
    Shuttle Foam Loss Linked to EPA Regs

    As recently as last month, NASA had been warned that foam insulation on the space shuttle’s external fuel tank could sheer off as it did in the 2003 Columbia disaster – a problem that has plagued space shuttle flights since NASA switched to a non-Freon-based type of foam insulation to comply with Clinton administration Environmental Protection Agency regulations.

    “Despite exhaustive work and considerable progress over the past 2-1/2 years, NASA has been unable to eliminate the possibility of dangerous pieces of foam and ice from breaking off the external fuel tank and striking the shuttle at liftoff,” the agency’s Return-to-Flight Task Force said just last month, according to The Associated Press.

    But instead of returning the much safer, politically incorrect, Freon-based foam for Discovery’s launch, the space agency tinkered with the application process, changing “the way the foam was applied to reduce the size and number of air pockets,” according to Newsday.

    “NASA chose to stick with non-Freon-based foam insulation on the booster rockets, despite evidence that this type of foam causes up to 11 times as much damage to thermal tiles as the older, Freon-based foam,” warned space expert Robert Garmong just nine months ago.

    In fact, though NASA never acknowledged that its environmentally friendly, more brittle foam had anything to do with the foam sheering problem, the link had been well documented within weeks of the Columbia disaster.

    In February 2003, for instance, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported:

    “NASA engineers have known for at least five years that insulating foam could peel off the space shuttle’s external fuel tanks and damage the vital heat-protecting tiles that the space agency says were the likely ‘root cause’ of Saturday’s shuttle disaster.”

    In a 1997 report, NASA mechanical systems engineer Greg Katnik “noted that the 1997 mission, STS-87, was the first to use a new method of ‘foaming’ the tanks, one designed to address NASA’s goal of using environmentally friendly products. The shift came as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was ordering many industries to phase out the use of Freon, an aerosol propellant linked to ozone depletion and global warming,” the Inquirer said.

    Before the environmentally friendly new insulation was used, about 40 of the spacecraft’s 26,000 ceramic tiles would sustain damage in missions. However, Katnik reported that NASA engineers found 308 “hits” to Columbia after a 1997 flight.

    A “massive material loss on the side of the external tank” caused much of the damage, Katnik wrote in an article in Space Team Online.

    He called the damage “significant.” One hundred thirty-two hits were bigger than 1 inch in diameter, and some slashes were as long as 15 inches.

    “As recently as last September [2002], a retired engineering manager for Lockheed Martin, the contractor that assembles the tanks, told a conference in New Orleans that developing a new foam to meet environmental standards had ‘been much more difficult than anticipated,’” the Inquirer said.

    The engineer, who helped design the thermal protection system, said that switching from the Freon foam “resulted in unanticipated program impacts, such as foam loss during flight.”

  2. Jon Says:
    January 28th, 2011 at 11:22 am

    Let us also remember those who died that were responsible for making the rockets, many more than that died in this tragic accident.

  3. krantcents Says:
    January 28th, 2011 at 8:31 pm

    That was a tragedy, I will remember forever, just like JFK assassination, and the attempted assassinations.

  4. Ryan Loos Says:
    January 29th, 2011 at 11:38 am

    I remember this well. I was also in class and the teacher has the TV on for all of us to watch. No one really understood what was happening for a few moments, then the teacher talked to us about. Something that I will never forget where I was. Just like during 9/11.

Comments