By JLP | July 8, 2013
Today’s quote of the day comes to us from the latest Kirk Karlgaard column in Forbes. This is the opening paragraph to his piece:
In early 1966 the Dow topped 1000 for the first time. In August 1982 the Dow was at 777. The apparent 22.3% loss in value over 16.5 years is actually much worse when adjusted for inflation—figure a 70% haircut, excluding dividends.
Why is this useless? Because he left out dividends.
I don’t have total returns for the Dow Jones Industrial Average but I do have the monthly total returns for the S&P 500 that we can use as an example. Based on my findings, using to the monthly total returns from January 1966 (the Dow crossed the 1000 mark during the day on January 18, 1966) through July 1982, the S&P had a total return of 130%. If inflation is included using the monthly CPI data, the total return over the period is -25%. No, it is not good. But, it is better than the numbers Kirk used in his column.
I have an email in to Dow Jones Indexes to see if I can get the actual total return numbers for the Dow. We will see if they come through for me.